Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1986
DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(86)90651-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
227
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
227
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for doing so, is to be able to use the fault lines instead of area sources and at the same time take into consideration the subduction by including two dipping planes (areasources) with the average dip of the Benioff zone in the area. Of course, in this case, the results reflect the drawbacks of both models but the combination of models is an approach used by many authors (Youngs and Coppersmith, 1985). If the hypothesis of a seismic gap is valid (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for doing so, is to be able to use the fault lines instead of area sources and at the same time take into consideration the subduction by including two dipping planes (areasources) with the average dip of the Benioff zone in the area. Of course, in this case, the results reflect the drawbacks of both models but the combination of models is an approach used by many authors (Youngs and Coppersmith, 1985). If the hypothesis of a seismic gap is valid (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Characteristic earthquake of a fault recurrence in PSHA is commonly modelled as the Characteristic Earthquake Model (Youngs and Coppersmith 1985). This model has a uniform distribution for the large earthquakes range and an exponential distribution for the smaller size earthquakes.…”
Section: Q T T T Q T Q T T T F D F D R T R T T H Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models include an exponential distribution with the b c -value for the large magnitude earthquakes and an exponential distribution with the b-value equal to 1.0 for the smaller magnitude earthquakes. An additional constraint is done by following the Youngs and Coppersmith (1985) characteristic model setting. The comparison result shows that reducing the b cvalue in the exponential distribution increases in the hazard contributions of a large earthquake.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Of B C -Value For the Characteristic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations