Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
10th IET International Conference on Developments in Power System Protection (DPSP 2010). Managing the Change 2010
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2010.0355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of fault current limitation for electrical distribution networks

Abstract: This paper explores the potential future need for fault current er system, and some of the technical implications of this change. It is estimated that approximately 300-400 distribution substations will require fault current limitation, based on the statistical analysis of the projected (or violation). The analysis uses a UK electrical system scenario that satisfies the 2 emissions by 2050. A case study involving the connection of distributed generation (DG) via a superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of resistive SFCLs on power system protection system have been examined, for example in [5], [17] and [21], and location A (at the bus-tie) is likely to have the lowest impact on overcurrent protection [5]; the overcurrent protection settings are the same, regardless of whether or not the bustie circuit breaker is closed. However for location D, the total prospective fault current may be substantially reduced if the bus-tie circuit breaker is open.…”
Section: Consequences Of Sfcls On Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The effects of resistive SFCLs on power system protection system have been examined, for example in [5], [17] and [21], and location A (at the bus-tie) is likely to have the lowest impact on overcurrent protection [5]; the overcurrent protection settings are the same, regardless of whether or not the bustie circuit breaker is closed. However for location D, the total prospective fault current may be substantially reduced if the bus-tie circuit breaker is open.…”
Section: Consequences Of Sfcls On Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because it will affect the length of the recovery time of a resistive SFCL [15]. Note that energy dissipation may be substantially lower if an impedance is placed in parallel with the SFCL [5] and external to the cryogenic environment, but this will also affect the current limitation properties [22]. It has been shown how, for location A, a relatively large SFCL resistance can reduce both the severity of electrical disturbances and the amount of energy dissipated in the SFCL during faults.…”
Section: Non-fault Transients and Their Potential To Cause Sfcl Mal-omentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations