2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-1022-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of differing input data sources and approaches upon forest carbon stock estimation

Abstract: Site index is an important forest inventory attribute that relates productivity and growth expectation of forests over time. In forest inventory programs, site index is used in conjunction with other forest inventory attributes (i.e., height, age) for the estimation of stand volume. In turn, stand volumes are used to estimate biomass (and biomass components) and enable conversion to carbon. In this research, we explore the implications and consequences of different estimates of site index on carbon stock chara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the lack of field data in remote areas and the inconsistency of data collection methods among different management units over large regions were the major constraints to obtaining reliable large-scale biomass estimation using field-based methods [12,13]. Moreover, obtaining comprehensive, spatially complete, temporally uniform, and accurate forest inventory data was usually time-consuming and labor-intensive over huge areas and field campaigns were not well suited for detecting changes because a single measurement campaign can extend over several years in most countries, especially in developing countries with large land area [12,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lack of field data in remote areas and the inconsistency of data collection methods among different management units over large regions were the major constraints to obtaining reliable large-scale biomass estimation using field-based methods [12,13]. Moreover, obtaining comprehensive, spatially complete, temporally uniform, and accurate forest inventory data was usually time-consuming and labor-intensive over huge areas and field campaigns were not well suited for detecting changes because a single measurement campaign can extend over several years in most countries, especially in developing countries with large land area [12,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing rise of anthropogenic C emissions has influenced ecosystem functioning [2,3], and forests should be monitored and evaluated for changes in above ground biomass, canopy cover, and other structural parameters. Forest canopy height is an important structural metric that relates directly to stand age for even aged forests, life cycle, and C sequestration potential when combined with existing allometric relationships [4,5]. Many remote sensing approaches exist to document the structural state of forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many remote sensing approaches exist to document the structural state of forests. RAdio Detection And Ranging (RADAR), Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR), and photogrammetric methods using stereo imagery, have all been used to measure forest structure and each approach has varying accuracies and implementation costs [4,6]. We evaluated two existing stereo forest canopy height model (CHM) approaches, one without ground control points (GCPs) and one with GCPs as others have shown substantial improvement in IKONOS mapping accuracy with GCPs [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the methods that allow for the estimation of stand biomass or volume are based on the distribution of point height values, described by descriptive statistics such as maximum, mean, standard deviation, percentiles, or proportions (Gobakken and Naesset 2005;Hollaus et al 2007;Magnussen and Boudewyn 1998). The ability of the laser beam to pass through small openings in the forest canopy allows for a threedimensional assessment of forest structure (Coops et al 2007;Falkowski et al 2009), including height measurements (Andersen et al 2006;Hollaus et al 2006;Naesset and Økland 2002), which allows for the accurate estimation of the dominant tree height (Naesset 1997;Wulder et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%