2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2019.100153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of aspect ratio on the uptake and nanotoxicity of gold nanomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, 12 metabolites showed differences only in the GNR-S group, indicating that GNR-S caused additional effects on Hep G2 cells. This may have been due to the smaller volume of GNR-S, which could facilitate penetration of the cells’ protective barrier to produce other toxic effects [ 43 ]. Z-score plots were constructed to display the statistically significant metabolites in the three GNR-dosed groups, as shown in Figure 2 i–k.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 12 metabolites showed differences only in the GNR-S group, indicating that GNR-S caused additional effects on Hep G2 cells. This may have been due to the smaller volume of GNR-S, which could facilitate penetration of the cells’ protective barrier to produce other toxic effects [ 43 ]. Z-score plots were constructed to display the statistically significant metabolites in the three GNR-dosed groups, as shown in Figure 2 i–k.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remarkable biological, chemical, and physical reactivity of ENMs determines their environmental transformations and allows them to interact with marine organisms through different exposure routes, including direct/indirect ingestion [ 21 , 125 ], contact with gills [ 126 , 127 ] and/or body adsorption [ 34 , 128 , 129 ].…”
Section: Current Knowledge On Enms Marine Ecotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bio–nano interface issues have been studied extensively in the context of drug delivery in situ , in vitro , and in vivo . They are less well understood for the performance and reproducibility of paper-based immunoassays. In immunoassays, the bio–nano interface issues are arguably even more significant, where interface effects for both the NP–antibody conjugate and also the nitrocellulose substrate can dominate the assay behavior. Here, we study the performance of the immunoprobes in paper dipstick immunoassays and how it is impacted by the immunoprobe synthesis strategy and surface architecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%