2015
DOI: 10.1002/pro.2814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of aromatic–aromatic interactions: From protein structures to peptide models

Abstract: With increasing structural information on proteins, the opportunity to understand physical forces governing protein folding is also expanding. One of the significant non-covalent forces between the protein side chains is aromatic-aromatic interactions. Aromatic interactions have been widely exploited and thoroughly investigated in the context of folding, stability, molecular recognition, and self-assembly processes. Through this review, we discuss the contribution of aromatic interactions to the activity and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
5
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…46,47 Besides, with its fused aromatic ring system Trp can undergo cation- π interactions 48 with positively charged choline groups of the lipids and detergents 49 and can also form hydrogen bonds, π -stacking, N–H··· π , and C–H··· π bonds. 50 These diverse interactions of tryptophan allow it to serve as a strong anchoring point for membrane and peripheral membrane proteins. To understand the role of Trp on phorbol ester binding in the truncated C1 domain, we generated three mutants, W22A, W22K, and W22D, in which tryptophan was replaced with a small nonpolar residue, with a positively charged residue, and with a negatively charged residue, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46,47 Besides, with its fused aromatic ring system Trp can undergo cation- π interactions 48 with positively charged choline groups of the lipids and detergents 49 and can also form hydrogen bonds, π -stacking, N–H··· π , and C–H··· π bonds. 50 These diverse interactions of tryptophan allow it to serve as a strong anchoring point for membrane and peripheral membrane proteins. To understand the role of Trp on phorbol ester binding in the truncated C1 domain, we generated three mutants, W22A, W22K, and W22D, in which tryptophan was replaced with a small nonpolar residue, with a positively charged residue, and with a negatively charged residue, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tryptophan is not only the most polarizable residue, but also has the capability to form a repertoire of interactions including hydrogen bonds, π-stacking, hydrophobic interactions, N—H...π, and C—H...π [7]. The diverse interaction network involving tryptophan allows this residue to serve as a strong anchoring point for membrane proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slower penetration with GN‐2 N pm 9 compared to the GN‐2 peptoid may be due to the aromatic N pm residue, which makes the hydrophobic interaction with the outer membrane lipids stronger, thus explaining the delayed penetration in the periplasmic space to reach and disturb the inner membrane. At high peptoid concentrations, self‐assembly of GN‐2 N pm 9 peptoid through aromatic‐aromatic interactions might occur, also limiting its ability to insert and penetrate the inner membrane . Remarkably, lowering the peptoid concentrations to 2× or 1× MIC, the rate of penetration into the inner membrane increased for peptides and particularly for peptoid GN‐2 N pm 9 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%