Implications for the self determine benevolence and self-protection in intergroup relations

Abstract

People often favor groups they belong to over those beyond the in-group boundary. Yet, in-group favoritism does not always occur, and people will sometimes favor an out-group over the in-group. We delineate theoretically when in-group favoritism (i.e., self-protection) and out-group favoritism (i.e., benevolence) should occur. In two experiments, groups’ relative status and competence stereotypes were manipulated; groups’ outcomes were non-contingent in Experiment 1 and contingent in Experiment 2. When allocating reward, members of a low status group were self-protective, favoring the in-group over the out-group under both non-contingent and contingent outcomes. Those with high status benevolently favored the out-group when outcomes were non-contingent, but were self-protective with contingent outcomes. People were willing to engage in social activities with an out-group member regardless of competence. However, when task collaboration had implications for the self, those with low status preferred competent over less competent out-group members. Traits of high status targets were differentiated by those with low status in both experiments, whereas those with high status differentiated low status members’ traits only when outcomes were contingent. A general principle fits the data: the implications of intergroup responses for the self determine benevolence and self-protection. Implications for the Self Determine Benevolence and Self Protection in Intergroup Relations

REVISITED CULTURAL HERITAGE & ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE PREFERENCES TO LEVERAGE SUSTAINABLE TOURISM PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON INDONESIA WORLD HERITAGE SITES

“…Benevolence Uniqueness Value (BUV) as considered as the local wisdom of destination is closely related with Revisited Cultural Heritage (RCH) with CR (5,727). The tourists are attracted and obtained unforgettable experiences from local people hospitalities as H2 is accepted (Malloy & Kinney, 2017;Shaw et al, 2020;Svare et al, 2019).…”

“…The significant relationship between Benevolence Uniqueness Value and Architectural Heritage Preferences is also accepted with CR (5,227). The local people hospitality, benevolence and uniqueness are becoming the attractive determinants factors to revisit and put the architectural heritage to the list to visit (Lin et al, 2021;Malloy & Kinney, 2017). For more details, see the following Table 3.…”

Visual Attention and Behavior Under Positive Stereotypes

“…There are two possible sources of the bias. Malloy and Kinney (2014) showed that during reward allocation, high status members (arbitrarily made though a minimal group paradigm) will often select the out-group members to receive a beneficial outcome if they do not see them as threatening to their own economic resources. Within the context of the current study, particularly for Low Afrocentric/White arrays, Low Afrocentric candidates (low status)…”

Development of autosensing for self-protection device based IOT

“…The percentage of women victims and crimes has become increasingly larger as more and more sale of self-protection devices records rapid growth. Therefore, the development of self-protection device for women which not only can be detected dangerous person in advance in case of going a woman alone in the middle of nowhere late at night but can prevents crimes is necessary [3], [4]. Firstly, user should establish a range of approaching to operate alarm sensor within the range and vibration or alarm sound is to inform user while sensing time and its location are transmitted guardian when the sensor is operating.…”