2014
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications for the lithospheric geometry of the Iapetus suture beneath Ireland based on electrical resistivity models from deep-probing magnetotellurics

Abstract: S U M M A R YBroad-band and long period magnetotelluric (MT) data were acquired at 39 stations along five NNW-SSE profiles crossing the Iapetus Suture Zone (ISZ) in Ireland. Regional strike analyses indicate that the vast majority of the MT data is consistent with an assumption of a 2-D geoelectric strike direction. Strike is N52 • E for the three easternmost profiles and N75 • E for the two westernmost profiles; these directions correlate well with the observed predominant geological strike of the study regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interstation horizontal magnetic transfer function (H) and the geomagnetic transfer function (T) data, which are not affected by electric field effects caused by galvanic distortion from charges on conductivity boundaries or gradients on small-scale structures, have been used to improve MT results and constrain the subsurface Meqbel et al 2014, Z, T and Z + T of field data, Rao et al 2014, Z and Z + T of field data; Yang et al 2015, Z and Z + T of field data; Varentsov 2015a,b, performing 2-D, 2-D+ and quasi 3-D inversion using Z, T and H with theoretical and field data), but no-one has yet undertaken an examination of the advantages of including H and T, simultaneously, when performing 3-D inversion of Z data (Z + H + T in 3-D). It should be noted that the magnetic effects caused by galvanic distortion charges do affect Z, H and T (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interstation horizontal magnetic transfer function (H) and the geomagnetic transfer function (T) data, which are not affected by electric field effects caused by galvanic distortion from charges on conductivity boundaries or gradients on small-scale structures, have been used to improve MT results and constrain the subsurface Meqbel et al 2014, Z, T and Z + T of field data, Rao et al 2014, Z and Z + T of field data; Yang et al 2015, Z and Z + T of field data; Varentsov 2015a,b, performing 2-D, 2-D+ and quasi 3-D inversion using Z, T and H with theoretical and field data), but no-one has yet undertaken an examination of the advantages of including H and T, simultaneously, when performing 3-D inversion of Z data (Z + H + T in 3-D). It should be noted that the magnetic effects caused by galvanic distortion charges do affect Z, H and T (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on average the observations are fitted within the estimated error. In practice however, real data can rarely be fit to that level (e.g., Rao et al 2014;Peacock et al 2015;Yang et al 2015). There can be a variety of reasons for this including overly optimistic error estimates or the inability to include sufficiently small surface structures in the inversion.…”
Section: Identifying Problems and Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If vertical electrical and/or magnetic transfer functions are the only available borehole data, the procedure is condensed to a two-step procedure where the first step is the same as in the three-step procedure. Note that similar stepwise inversion strategies are typically applied in the inversion of surface impedance and VMTF data (e.g., Weckmann et al 2007;Rao et al 2014). When the number of complementary data sets entering into the inversion is increased, such as in our three-step procedure, it can be expected that the acceptable model space is reduced and the model becomes better constrained by the data.…”
Section: D Inversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%