2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications for colored HOMFLY polynomials from explicit formulas for group-theoretical structure

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which depend on integration contour (knot) K, the coupling constant g, the size N of the sl N gauge algebra and its representation R. Dependence on g and N is actually through the non-perturbative variables q = exp 2πi g+N and A = q N , of which H K is -mysteriously -just a polynomial. For a recent progress in perturbative approach see [51,52]. Dependence on K and R is more tricky, and the better (less redundant) variables are the coefficients F K Q of the differential (cyclotomic) expansion , which we write down restricted in two ways -to symmetric representations and to defect [23] zero -according to the limited consideration in this paper.…”
Section: Differential Expansion (De)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which depend on integration contour (knot) K, the coupling constant g, the size N of the sl N gauge algebra and its representation R. Dependence on g and N is actually through the non-perturbative variables q = exp 2πi g+N and A = q N , of which H K is -mysteriously -just a polynomial. For a recent progress in perturbative approach see [51,52]. Dependence on K and R is more tricky, and the better (less redundant) variables are the coefficients F K Q of the differential (cyclotomic) expansion , which we write down restricted in two ways -to symmetric representations and to defect [23] zero -according to the limited consideration in this paper.…”
Section: Differential Expansion (De)mentioning
confidence: 99%