Abstract:The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins are essential for the maintenance of genomic stability of human cells. Compared with hereditary or even sporadic carcinomas, MMR gene mutations are very uncommon in leukemia. However, genetic instability, attested by either loss of heterozygosity or microsatellite instability, has been extensively documented in chronic or acute malignant myeloid disorders. This observation suggests that in leukemia some internal or external signals may interfere with MMR protein expressio… Show more
“…The same group found that hMSH2 and hMSH6 are phosphorylated in vitro and in vivo, and that phosphorylation is required for nuclear translocation and G-T binding. 35,36 Phosphorylation of hMSH2 can be accomplished by PKC-f and protects hMutSa from degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. 37 Cadmium, a known carcinogen and an environmental concern from improperly disposed rechargeable batteries, was recently shown to inhibit MMR, leading to an increase in mutation rates up to 2,000-fold.…”
DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is one of the several enzyme systems involved in DNA homeostasis. DNA MMR is involved in the repair of specific types of errors that occur during new DNA synthesis; loss of this system leads to an accelerated accumulation of potential mutations, and predisposes to certain types of cancers. Germline mutations in some of the DNA MMR genes cause the hereditary cancer predisposition, Lynch syndrome. This review addresses advances in the biochemistry of DNA MMR and its relationship to carcinogenesis. ' 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Key words: DNA mismatch repair; microsatellite instability; lynch syndrome; HNPCC; colorectal cancer; hMSH2; hMLH1; hMSH6; hPMS2; exonuclease IThe DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system was at one time in the exclusive domain of the microbial biochemist, but has been thrust into the mainstream of the cancer biologist because of its importance in carcinogenesis. Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers develop through mechanisms whereby this form of DNA maintenance is lost, leading to 100-to 1,000-fold increases in error rates during replication. This review of recent progress in DNA MMR research is intended for the tumor biologist who is interested in structural and functional details of this system. There have been several reviews of the clinical aspects of DNA MMR that emphasize the diagnostic uses of testing for microsatellite instability and the use of immunohistochemistry of the DNA MMR proteins in colorectal cancer. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] This review will serve to complement those reviews, and will highlight some of the biochemical issues that underlie DNA MMR.
Components of the DNA MMR systemThe DNA MMR system corrects DNA base pairing errors in newly replicated DNA. The primary DNA polymerase in eukaryotic S phase DNA replication, polymerase d, has 3 0 > 5 0 proofreading activity that corrects 99% of replication errors. Nevertheless, mispaired nucleotides are occasionally left behind, as are small insertion/deletion mutations that are prone to occur at repetitive sequences. Microsatellites are multiple tandem repeats in which the repetitive element consists of a short number of nucleotides (perhaps 6 or fewer, and for functional studies, usually 1-4), and these are particularly prone to slippage and inefficient proofreading by DNA polymerase. The MMR system is critical to correct these problems, and if inactivated, the resulting shortening of microsatellites is a telltale sign of the ensuing ''microsatellite instability'' (MSI) phenotype. MSI testing is most often performed on mononucleotide or dinucleotide repeats.A casual description of the MMR system would state that the MMR system is chiefly a sensory system that scans DNA, and when a nucleotide mispair is detected, removes the error and summons DNA polymerase to repeat the synthesis, and this time corrects the error. This works because even in repetitive sequences, the error rate of DNA polymerase is low, and so simply having a second chance usually fixes the problem.More formally, the MMR system is an excision/resynt...
“…The same group found that hMSH2 and hMSH6 are phosphorylated in vitro and in vivo, and that phosphorylation is required for nuclear translocation and G-T binding. 35,36 Phosphorylation of hMSH2 can be accomplished by PKC-f and protects hMutSa from degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. 37 Cadmium, a known carcinogen and an environmental concern from improperly disposed rechargeable batteries, was recently shown to inhibit MMR, leading to an increase in mutation rates up to 2,000-fold.…”
DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is one of the several enzyme systems involved in DNA homeostasis. DNA MMR is involved in the repair of specific types of errors that occur during new DNA synthesis; loss of this system leads to an accelerated accumulation of potential mutations, and predisposes to certain types of cancers. Germline mutations in some of the DNA MMR genes cause the hereditary cancer predisposition, Lynch syndrome. This review addresses advances in the biochemistry of DNA MMR and its relationship to carcinogenesis. ' 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Key words: DNA mismatch repair; microsatellite instability; lynch syndrome; HNPCC; colorectal cancer; hMSH2; hMLH1; hMSH6; hPMS2; exonuclease IThe DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system was at one time in the exclusive domain of the microbial biochemist, but has been thrust into the mainstream of the cancer biologist because of its importance in carcinogenesis. Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers develop through mechanisms whereby this form of DNA maintenance is lost, leading to 100-to 1,000-fold increases in error rates during replication. This review of recent progress in DNA MMR research is intended for the tumor biologist who is interested in structural and functional details of this system. There have been several reviews of the clinical aspects of DNA MMR that emphasize the diagnostic uses of testing for microsatellite instability and the use of immunohistochemistry of the DNA MMR proteins in colorectal cancer. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] This review will serve to complement those reviews, and will highlight some of the biochemical issues that underlie DNA MMR.
Components of the DNA MMR systemThe DNA MMR system corrects DNA base pairing errors in newly replicated DNA. The primary DNA polymerase in eukaryotic S phase DNA replication, polymerase d, has 3 0 > 5 0 proofreading activity that corrects 99% of replication errors. Nevertheless, mispaired nucleotides are occasionally left behind, as are small insertion/deletion mutations that are prone to occur at repetitive sequences. Microsatellites are multiple tandem repeats in which the repetitive element consists of a short number of nucleotides (perhaps 6 or fewer, and for functional studies, usually 1-4), and these are particularly prone to slippage and inefficient proofreading by DNA polymerase. The MMR system is critical to correct these problems, and if inactivated, the resulting shortening of microsatellites is a telltale sign of the ensuing ''microsatellite instability'' (MSI) phenotype. MSI testing is most often performed on mononucleotide or dinucleotide repeats.A casual description of the MMR system would state that the MMR system is chiefly a sensory system that scans DNA, and when a nucleotide mispair is detected, removes the error and summons DNA polymerase to repeat the synthesis, and this time corrects the error. This works because even in repetitive sequences, the error rate of DNA polymerase is low, and so simply having a second chance usually fixes the problem.More formally, the MMR system is an excision/resynt...
“…The results presented here are representative of three independent experiments. (Humbert et al, 2002). In the same experiment, we also examined the G2/M checkpoint recovery efficiency by monitoring histone-gH2AX labeling in mitotic cells, as it has been shown that the level of its expression correlates with the amount of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the DNA (McManus and Hendzel, 2005;Bouquet et al, 2006).…”
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells exposed to genotoxic agents arrest their cell cycle at the G2/M checkpoint and are inherently chemoresistant. To understand the mechanism of this chemoresistance, we compared the ability of immature CD34 þ versus mature CD34À AML cell lines (KG1a and U937, respectively) to recover from a DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoint in G2. Here, we report that KG1a cells have a more stringent G2/M checkpoint response than U937 cells. We show that in both cell types, the CDC25B phosphatase participates in the G2/M checkpoint recovery and that its expression is upregulated. Furthermore, we show that CHK1 inhibition by UCN-01 in immature KG1a cells allows checkpoint exit and induces sensitivity to genotoxic agents. Similarly, UCN-01 treatment potentializes genotoxic-induced inhibition of colony formation efficiency of primary leukemic cells from AML patients. Altogether, our results demonstrate that checkpoint stringency varies during the maturation process and indicate that targeting checkpoint mechanisms might represent an attractive therapeutic opportunity for chemoresistant immature AML cells.
“…Ubiquitination and degradation rates of hMSH2 and hMSH6 appear quite similar, suggesting that UPS-mediated proteolysis may maintain a constant ratio of these two proteins (Hernandez-Pigeon et al, 2004). While no strong correlation between total proteasomal activity and the degradation rate of hMutS has been observed in vitro, low hMutS expression in cells is a limiting factor for MMR and indicative of proteolytic activity of the UPS in MMR regulation (Ciechanover, 1994;Humbert et al, 2002;Hernandez-Pigeon et al, 2004). This process is regulated also by an atypical protein kinase C (PKC ); this kinase increases hMutS protein levels and the binding of hMutS to G•T mismatches (Hernandez-Pigeon et al, 2005).…”
Section: Mismatch Repair and The Upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UPS is involved in post-transcriptional regulation of hMutS protein expression (Humbert et al, 2002;Hernandez-Pigeon et al, 2004). Ubiquitination and degradation rates of hMSH2 and hMSH6 appear quite similar, suggesting that UPS-mediated proteolysis may maintain a constant ratio of these two proteins (Hernandez-Pigeon et al, 2004).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.