1992
DOI: 10.1126/science.1317056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implication of GAP in Ras-dependent transactivation of a polyoma enhancer sequence

Abstract: Controversy exists as to whether the interaction of a guanosine triphosphatase activating protein (GAP) with Ras proteins functions both to initiate and to terminate Ras-dependent signaling events or only to terminate them. GAP-C, a carboxyl-terminal fragment of GAP that is sufficient to stimulate GTPase activity, inhibited the stimulation of transcription produced by some oncoproteins (v-Src, polyoma middle T, wild-type Ras, and oncogenic Ras) but not that produced by v-Mos. Wild-type GAP did not affect trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Type I GAP inhibited the wt H-Ras induction of a reporter gene regulated by AP-1 promoter elements and also reduced serum-stimulated DNA synthesis, a process which is thought to depend upon endogenous wt Ras (24,29). These data support the hypothesis that type I GAP can act as a negative regulator of wt Ras, although it may also act as an effector of Ras (12,17,27 While type I GAP has been isolated primarily from the cytosolic fraction of quiescent cells (23), it can be speculated that GAP associates with Ras at the membrane at some time in the regulatory cycle, thereby lending support for this possibility. Alternatively, the two forms of GAP may have different half-lives in cells, which could also give rise to the observed cellular activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Type I GAP inhibited the wt H-Ras induction of a reporter gene regulated by AP-1 promoter elements and also reduced serum-stimulated DNA synthesis, a process which is thought to depend upon endogenous wt Ras (24,29). These data support the hypothesis that type I GAP can act as a negative regulator of wt Ras, although it may also act as an effector of Ras (12,17,27 While type I GAP has been isolated primarily from the cytosolic fraction of quiescent cells (23), it can be speculated that GAP associates with Ras at the membrane at some time in the regulatory cycle, thereby lending support for this possibility. Alternatively, the two forms of GAP may have different half-lives in cells, which could also give rise to the observed cellular activities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This is in accordance with several studies showing that the effect of the prototypic GAP protein p120 as a negative regulator of Ras is commenced by protein-protein interactions through its various noncatalytic domains (Martin et al, 1992;Schweighoffer et al, 1992;Clark et al, 1993Clark et al, , 1997Drugan et al, 2000). This allosteric effect of the noncatalytic domains on the GAP activity was demonstrated when overexpression of sequences from the NH 2 -terminal region of p120 GAP (N-GAP), excluding the Ras-interacting catalytic domain, modulated Ras signaling.…”
Section: Egf Induces Pkc-dependent Phosphorylation Of the N-terminussupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One attractive candidate for a Ras effector protein, other than the Raf kinase (19), is GAP (47,63). Ras binds GAP via its COOH-terminal domain (GAP-C) (27), while the NH 2 terminal region appears to be essential for triggering downstream signals (6,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%