Implicación de usuarios diagnosticados de Trastorno de Ansiedad Generalizada en la elaboración de una guía de práctica clínica

Amor, Gisela; Vega, Amanda; Villena, Alicia; Gómez-Ocaña, Clara; Morales‐Asencio, José Miguel; Hurtado, María M.

doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy.17-2.iudt

Cited by 4 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the 12 included studies, 3 were carried out in Spain [26][27][28], 2 were carried out in the UK [29,30], 3 were carried out in Canada [31][32][33], 1 was carried out in Sweden [34], 1 was carried out in the Netherlands [35], 1 as carried out in Ireland [36] and 1 was carried out in the United States [37].…”

Section: Countrymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seven studies [26,27,[31][32][33][34]36] reported patients' experiences with GAD and their attitudes towards medication and psychotherapy. Three others [29,30,35] included both patients' and professionals' perspectives and their attitudes towards medication and psychotherapy, and one study described The design and use of professionals' and patients' experiences with GAD and the healthcare system [28].…”

Section: Objectivementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the included studies used interviews, mainly semi-structured interview [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]37]; 2 studies employed focus groups [26,27], and one study was based on a case study [36].…”

Section: Data Collection Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four studies were conducted in PC [30,[35][36][37], four studies were conducted in outpatient mental health services [26][27][28]34], one study was conducted in municipal community services [29], one study was conducted in metropolitan outpatient psychiatric services [32], and two studies was carried out in a non-specified outpatient setting [31,33].…”

Section: Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Six studies included only patients with GAD [26,27,31,32,34,36], while another study included general practitioners (GPs) [37]. The rest of the included a combined sample of patients with GAD, anxiety disorders or depression and GPs [29,30,33,35].…”

Section: Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Framing the process in the implementation of care for people with generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders in primary care (PC). GAD has low remission and high relapse rates over long follow-up periods. Qualitative evidence was synthesized to understand the implementation of care and treatment options for people with GAD in PC. Methods Research published from 2008 to September 2020 was searched in five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, WOS and PsycArticles). Studies that used qualitative methods for data collection and analysis to investigate the implementation of care and treatment options for people with GAD in PC and outpatient settings were included. Non-qualitative studies, mixed methods studies that did not separately report qualitative findings and studies in languages other than English or Spanish were excluded. We used the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) framework to assess the overall confidence in the findings. Results The results with a moderate level of confidence showed that the trajectory of care for people with GAD in PC and outpatient settings is long and fluctuates over time, involving multiple difficulties in accessing and maintaining initial treatment or successive treatment options. In addition, there are wide variations in the preferences for and acceptability of different treatment options. The results with a high level of confidence indicated that more information on GAD and its treatment options is needed for PC practitioners, GAD patients and their carers. The results with a low level of confidence suggested that patients use antidepressants for longer than recommended and that the interruption of treatment is not usually planned. Conclusions Initial resistance to new treatments among people with GAD can make access and adherence to treatment difficult. Improving care may require patients to be informed of possible trajectories in stepped care pathways before the initiation of treatment so they are aware that they may need to try a number of options until the most effective treatment for them is found. Increased awareness of and information materials on GAD may facilitate both appropriate diagnosis and long-term care.

show abstract

Section: Countrymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Objectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Data Collection Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Framing the process in the implementation of care for people with generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Use of the ADAPTE method to develop a clinical guideline for the improvement of psychoses and schizophrenia care: Example of involvement and participation of patients and family caregivers

Hurtado

Quemada

García‐Herrera

et al. 2021

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The aim of this study is to analyse different ways of participation during the development of a clinical guideline to improve the early detection of psychosis and to deploy a comprehensive treatment plan to improve prognosis and social integration. Materials and method The clinical guideline was developed using the ADAPTE method with the participation of 40 authors and 80 external reviewers. The process was divided into three major phases: set up, adaptation and finalization. During adaptation and completion, a total of 44 patients and 18 family caregivers were involved. Results and conclusions The different roles assumed by the patients and their family caregivers were described, depending on the panel in which they participated, with diverse grades of complexity: a user as author, integration of the results of qualitative research with the participation of local users and family caregivers, 13 users as individual external reviewers and the participation of users and caregiver organizations in the external review. In the guideline, contributions from patients during the qualitative research were included in an innovative way, placing them just behind the recommendations. On the other hand, the results of the family caregivers’ study were included in a specific area of uncertainty. Further, the expressed point of view was considered as the collective demands of users and family caregivers’ organizations in the cost‐benefit analysis made by the organizing committee. There were diverse ways to conduct direct patient participation during the guideline development, ensuring that their individual experiences contributed significantly to the final version.

show abstract

Mindfulness and Generalized Anexita Disorder

Refusta Ainaga,

Refusta Ainaga

2022

JYP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implicación de usuarios diagnosticados de Trastorno de Ansiedad Generalizada en la elaboración de una guía de práctica clínica

Cited by 4 publications

References 5 publications

Framing the process in the implementation of care for people with generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Framing the process in the implementation of care for people with generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Use of the ADAPTE method to develop a clinical guideline for the improvement of psychoses and schizophrenia care: Example of involvement and participation of patients and family caregivers

Mindfulness and Generalized Anexita Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About