2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-014-0790-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing web 2.0 tools in the classroom: Four teachers’ accounts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives the idea that students have a positive attitude toward making efficient use of the tool. The findings appear to be in agreement with the findings that were obtained in the earlier research that was carried out [2], [6], [7], [13], [16], [20], [22]. According to the findings, the incorporation of technology into educational environments led to improved levels of enjoyment among students, as well as favorable attitudes toward the process of learning and higher levels of intrinsic motivation.…”
Section: Enhancement Of Motivation and Attitudessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This gives the idea that students have a positive attitude toward making efficient use of the tool. The findings appear to be in agreement with the findings that were obtained in the earlier research that was carried out [2], [6], [7], [13], [16], [20], [22]. According to the findings, the incorporation of technology into educational environments led to improved levels of enjoyment among students, as well as favorable attitudes toward the process of learning and higher levels of intrinsic motivation.…”
Section: Enhancement Of Motivation and Attitudessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Chinnery [12] thinks that Google's technologies have high educational values since they foster communication, information sharing, efficacy, and teamwork. Kovalik et al [13] found that using Google tools brings fun to learning and students have positive attitudes towards learning. Rogers [14] and Docrat [15] emphasized the exceptional advantages of Google products for users in education sectors, including ease, simplicity, and collaboration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, the teacher consulted both the lesson book and the Internet, but decided how the content would be presented in which activity. In another study that emphasized the importance of online teaching material planning process, Kovalik et al (2014) used four different Web 2.0 tools used by four different teachers' in their teaching process, and found that contrary to the teacher and the researcher in the current study, the teachers did not undertake detailed planning; and while students enjoyed using the environment when instructions were provided, this was not sustained. Additionally, it was stated that using Web 2.0 tools in the teaching environment required serious planning and process management.…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In their study, Baş and Turhan (2017) reached the conclusion that the Poll Everywhere WEB 2.0 tool they developed increased experimental group students' desire to write and made them want the tool to be used all the time in their writing class. In their study, Kovalik et al (2014) found out that students responded positively to the lessons done using WEB 2.0 tools. Gömleksiz and Pullu (2017) announce that the activities created with Toondoo, one of the WEB 2.0 tools, positively affected students' attitudes towards the course.…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%