2014
DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2014.894123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing two treatment approaches to childhood dysarthria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2015), to the best of our knowledge, no published studies have described dysarthria characteristics in French‐speaking children with CP, nor have any examined the effects of treatment strategies on the children's intelligibility. Even speech treatment for English‐speaking children with dysarthria has received attention in only a small number of studies (e.g., Fox and Boliek 2012, Levy 2014, 2018, Levy et al . 2012, Miller et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2015), to the best of our knowledge, no published studies have described dysarthria characteristics in French‐speaking children with CP, nor have any examined the effects of treatment strategies on the children's intelligibility. Even speech treatment for English‐speaking children with dysarthria has received attention in only a small number of studies (e.g., Fox and Boliek 2012, Levy 2014, 2018, Levy et al . 2012, Miller et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013, 2014). Moreover, training vocal intensity is a key element of Ramig et al .’s (2001) Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) LOUD, which has been found to increase speech function in small studies of English‐speaking children with dysarthria (Fox and Boliek 2012, Levy 2014, Levy et al . 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The few studies of intervention for children with dysarthria using a systems-based approach focusing on respiration, phonatory control, phrase length, and speech rate (e.g., Levy, 2014;Levy et al, 2012;Pennington et al, 2013;Pennington, Smallman, & Farrier, 2006) have found promising improvement in intelligibility in children with dysarthria. Similarly, LSVT LOUD yielded benefits to ratings of articulatory precision and acoustic measures in this population (Fox & Boliek, 2012;Levy et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that both speech motor control and cognitive-linguistic skills may be impaired in children with CP, speech rate and its characteristics likely develop differently in children with CP than their typically developing peers (e.g., Cockerill et al, 2014;Hustad et al, 2010;Mei et al, 2014Mei et al, , 2016Nordberg et al, 2013;Pakula, Van Naarden Braun, & Yeargin-Allsopp, 2009;Parkes et al, 2010). It is important to understand the development of speech rate and its characteristics in children with CP because speech rate is a common target in speech intervention to improve intelligibility in children with CP (Levy, 2014;Pennington, Miller, Robson, & Steen, 2010;Pennington et al, 2013;Pennington, Smallman, & Farrier, 2006) and habitual articulation rate and pausing patterns may significantly impact intervention success. Hustad and Sassano (2002) found that, by training adults with CP (N = 2) to insert pauses between each word of a sentence, the resultant decrease in speech rate resulted in intelligibility gains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%