Implementing the care programme for the last days of life in an acute geriatric hospital ward: a phase 2 mixed method study

Abstract

BackgroundTo improve the quality of end-of-life care in geriatric hospital wards we developed the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life. It consists of 1) the Care Guide for the Last Days of Life, 2) supportive documentation and 3) an implementation guide. The aim of this study is (1) to determine the feasibility of implementing the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life in the acute geriatric hospital setting and (2) to explore the health care professionals’ perceptions of the effects of the Care Programme on end-of-life care.MethodsA phase 2 mixed methods study according with the MRC framework was performed in the acute geriatric ward of Ghent University Hospital between 1 April and 30 September 2013. During the implementation process a mixed methods approach was used including observation, interviews and the use of a quantitative process evaluation tool. This tool measured the success of implementation using several indicators, such as whether a steering group was formed, whether and how much of the health care staff was informed and trained and how many patients were cared for according to the Care Guide for the Last Days of Life.ResultsThe process evaluation tool showed that implementing the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life in the geriatric ward was successful and thus feasible; a steering group was formed consisting of two facilitators, health care staff of the geriatric ward were trained in using the Care Guide for the Last Days of Life which was subsequently introduced onto the ward and approximately 57 % of all dying patients were cared for according to the Care Guide for the Last Days of Life.With regard to health care professionals’ perceptions, nurses and physicians experienced the Care Guide for the Last Days of Life as improving the overall documentation of care, improving communication among health care staff and between health care staff and patient/family and improving the quality of end-of-life care. Barriers to implementing the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life successfully are, among others, difficulties with the content of the documents used within the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life and the low participation rate of physicians in the training sessions and audits.ConclusionsResults of this mixed methods study suggest that implementing the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life is feasible and that it has favorable effects on end-of-life care as reported by health care professionals. Based on the identified barriers during the implementation process, we were able to make recommendations for future implementation and further refine the Care Programme for the Last Days of Life before implementing it in a phase 3 cluster randomized controlled trial for the evaluation of its effectiveness.

A Practical Framework for Understanding and Reducing Medical Overuse: Conceptualizing Overuse Through the Patient‐Clinician Interaction

“…This framework can guide interventions to reduce overuse in important parts of the healthcare system while ensuring the final goal of high-quality individualized patient care. Culture: broad campaign across the medical center Clinician: education about evidence/guidelines 43,44 Practice environment: EMR alert 35 A physician hospital leader wishes to reduce inpatient opioid prescribing Clinician factors: misperception of patient/parent desires, discomfort with pain treatment 81 Practice environment: pressure to discharge patients leading to aggressive pain treatment Patient factors: poor understanding of the potential harms of opioids, demand Patient-clinician interaction: poor communication regarding pain itself and the benefits/harms of therapy Clinician: education about guidelines/evidence 43,44 Patient: provide information about options for treating pain and potential opioid harms Patient-clinician interaction: physician-directed tool for communicating about the issue 49 A palliative care fellow seeks to reduce imaging tests in EOL hospitalized patients Culture of healthcare: need to define clinical problems even if there is no intervention, discomfort with doing nothing Clinician factors: belief that more information helps patients, belief that patients desire testing Patient factors: poor knowledge or acceptance of prognosis Patient-clinician interaction: poor communication regarding prognosis and EOL preferences Clinician factors: education about harms of testing in these patients Patient-clinician interaction: specific tools to improve communication about EOL preferences 49,78 NOTE: Abbreviations: EMR, electronic medical record; EOL, end of life.…”

“Palliative Syringe Driver”? A Mixed-Methods Study in Different Hospital Departments on Continuous Infusions of Sedatives and/or Opioids in End-of-Life Care

“…Using the label palliative solely for patients in the dying phase and equating continuous infusion therapy with palliative care are not in accordance with the palliative care aspiration of holistic care and early integration. Numerous studies have indicated suboptimal quality of end-of-life care in general hospital departments, which has led to the development of recommendations and programs in recent years 43 . The present study underlines the need to include symptom control with continuous infusions in recommendations and provides crucial information for further developments.…”

Symptom management and palliative care in advanced basal cell carcinoma

“…Psychotherapy conducted by a professional psychologist aims to give direction to the patient's defense mechanisms, so they could serve as a form of adaptation. Cooperation with a cleric and support of volunteer caretakers can also help in achieving this goal [20,21].…”