Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance

Ardern, Clare L; Büttner, Fionn; Andrade, Renato; Weir, Adam; Ashe, Maureen C.; Holden, Sinéad; Impellizzeri, Franco M.; Delahunt, Eamonn; Dijkstra, Paul; Mathieson, Stephanie; Rathleff, Michael Skovdal; Reurink, Gustaaf; Sherrington, Catherine; Stamatakis, Emmanuel; Vicenzino, B.; Whittaker, Jackie L.; Wright, Alexis A.; Clarke, Mike; Moher, David; Page, Matthew J.; Khan, Karim M.; Winters, Marinus

doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-103987

Cited by 162 publications

(101 citation statements)

References 88 publications

(147 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This review was carried out according to guidelines set forth by PRISMA and Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science (PERSiST) (4,37). The research questions were defined by the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, and Study Design) model in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, as follows:Population: Subjects with or without RT experience and without a medical condition.Intervention: Chronic RT interventions that incorporated exercise variation.Comparator: Muscular adaptations compared with nonvaried exercises routines.Outcomes: Muscle hypertrophy and strength.Study design: Longitudinal randomized control trials employing either parallel group(s) or within-subject designs.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Varying Resistance Exercises Promote Superior Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains? A Systematic Review

Kassiano

Nunes

Costa

et al. 2022

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Varying Resistance Exercises Promote Superior Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains? A Systematic Review

Kassiano

Nunes

Costa

et al. 2022

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this overview of SRs and NMA, we followed the PRISMA 2020 Statement items for SRs in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields, 18 and the PRISMA extension statement for reporting of SRs incorporating NMA of health care interventions 19 . The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42021248499.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Active video game on children and adolescents' physical activity and weight management: A network meta‐analysis

Chan

Liu

et al. 2022

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We synthesized evidence on the effectiveness of active video games (AVGs) versus no AVG‐applied comparators on various physical activity (PA) levels and weight management outcomes in children and adolescents. We analyzed the comparative evidence on different sub‐categories of AVGs and ranking the best option. An overview of systematic reviews (SRs) and network meta‐analysis (NMA) (PROSPERO: CRD42021248499) was employed. A search for relevant literature published in English was conducted in six electronic databases from their inception until April 2021. SRs consisting of randomized control trials (RCTs) and satisfying our PICOS inclusion criteria were included. RCTs included were a comparison of groups among children and adolescents between 6 and 21, where groups with AVG interventions were compared with groups without them. Direct head‐to‐head pairwise meta‐analyses were conducted using weighted mean difference between the two groups, and the comparative effectiveness of different sub‐categories of AVGs was analyzed indirectly using NMA. Overall, 17 SRs were identified from the 6036 screened citations. Of these, 350 citations were retrieved, and 12 RCTs were finally included. Compared with no AVG group, AVG groups were shown to be more effective in achieving vigorous, moderate‐to‐vigorous, and moderate PA levels, and decreased BMI and body fat. NMA showed that rhythmic dance games had the highest probability of being the most effective sub‐category for reducing BMI. AVGs are effective in attaining vigorous, moderate to vigorous, and moderate PA levels, and reducing BMI and body fat among children and adolescents. Dance appears to be the best option for reducing BMI among AVG subcategories.

show abstract

“…The study methodology followed systematic review methods proposed by the Cochrane Handbook,11 and reported findings following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement12 and the recently published Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science guide 13. The protocol of this systematic review has been registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO; #CRD42016038166; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO) and published in a peer-reviewed academic journal 6.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does motor control training improve pain and function in adults with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 861 subjects in 16 trials

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of motor control training (MCT) compared with other physical therapist-led interventions, minimal/no intervention or surgery in patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH).DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesEight databases and the ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to April 2021.Eligibility criteriaWe included clinical trial studies with concurrent comparison groups which examined the effectiveness of MCT in patients with symptomatic LDH. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and functional status which were expressed as mean difference (MD) and standardised mean difference (SMD), respectively.ResultsWe screened 6695 articles, of which 16 clinical trials (861 participants) were eligible. Fourteen studies were judged to have high risk of bias and two studies had some risk of bias. In patients who did not undergo surgery, MCT resulted in clinically meaningful pain reduction compared with other physical therapist-led interventions (ie, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)) at short-term (MD –28.85, –40.04 to −17.66, n=69, studies=2). However, the robustness of the finding was poor. For functional status, a large and statistically significant treatment effect was found in favour of MCT compared with traditional/classic general exercises at long-term (SMD −0.83 to –1.35 to −0.31, n=63, studies=1) and other physical therapist-led interventions (ie, TENS) at short-term (SMD −1.43 to –2.41 to −0.46, n=69, studies=2). No studies compared MCT with surgery. In patients who had undergone surgery, large SMDs were seen. In favour of MCT compared with traditional/classic general exercises (SMD −0.95 to –1.32 to −0.58, n=124, studies=3), other physical therapist-led interventions (ie, conventional treatments; SMD −2.30 to –2.96 to −1.64, n=60, studies=1), and minimal intervention (SMD −1.34 to –1.87 to −0.81, n=68, studies=2) for functional improvement at short-term. The overall certainty of evidence was very low to low.ConclusionAt short-term, MCT improved pain and function compared with TENS in patients with symptomatic LDH who did not have surgery. MCT improved function compared with traditional/classic general exercises at long-term in patients who had undergone surgery. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the high risk of bias in the majority of studies.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016038166.

show abstract

Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance

Cited by 162 publications

References 88 publications

Does Varying Resistance Exercises Promote Superior Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains? A Systematic Review

Does Varying Resistance Exercises Promote Superior Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains? A Systematic Review

Active video game on children and adolescents' physical activity and weight management: A network meta‐analysis

Does motor control training improve pain and function in adults with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 861 subjects in 16 trials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About