Implementing Structured Clinical Templates at a Single Tertiary Hospital: Survey Study

Abstract

Background Electronic health record (EHR) systems have been widely adopted in hospitals. However, since current EHRs mainly focus on lowering the number of paper documents used, they have suffered from poor search function and reusability capabilities. To overcome these drawbacks, structured clinical templates have been proposed; however, they are not widely used owing to the inconvenience of data entry. Objective This study aims to verify the usability of structured templates by comparing data entry times. Methods A Korean tertiary hospital has implemented structured clinical templates with the modeling of clinical contents for the last 6 years. As a result, 1238 clinical content models (ie, body measurements, vital signs, and allergies) have been developed and 492 models for 13 clinical templates, including pathology reports, were applied to EHRs for clinical practice. Then, to verify the usability of the structured templates, data entry times from free-texts and four structured pathology report templates were compared using 4391 entries from structured data entry (SDE) log data and 4265 entries from free-text log data. In addition, a paper-based survey and a focus group interview were conducted with 23 participants from three different groups, including EHR developers, pathology transcriptionists, and clinical data extraction team members. Results Based on the analysis of time required for data entry, in most cases, beginner users of the structured clinical templates required at most 70.18% more time for data entry. However, as users became accustomed to the templates, they were able to enter data more quickly than via free-text entry: at least 1 minute and 23 seconds (16.8%) up to 5 minutes and 42 seconds (27.6%). Interestingly, well-designed thyroid cancer pathology reports required 14.54% less data entry time from the beginning of the SDE implementation. In the interviews and survey, we confirmed that most of the interviewees agreed on the need for structured templates. However, they were skeptical about structuring all the items included in the templates. Conclusions The increase in initial elapsed time led users to hold a negative opinion of SDE, despite its benefits. To overcome these obstacles, it is necessary to structure the clinical templates for optimum use. In addition, user experience in terms of ease of data entry must be considered as an essential aspect in the development of structured clinical templates.

Additional Value From Free-Text Diagnoses in Electronic Health Records: Hybrid Dictionary and Machine Learning Classification Study

“…The digitization of health records offers an opportunity to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into patient management. However, health care workers often prefer to write unstructured text rather than entering structured data [ 1 , 2 ]. This raises the question of how future electronic health records (EHRs) should be designed: what additional value does free text provide?…”

Establishing an effective clinical data collecting tool for optimal evaluation of native and allograft renal biopsies

“…We thus aimed to create a standardized, efficient, and environmentally friendly electronic clinical data form that would be easy to use for the nephrologist. The importance of clinical information in surgical pathology [ 3 ] and the benefits of standardization of the surgical pathology report and structured clinical templates [ [4] , [5] , [6] ] have been documented in the literature. However, to our knowledge, a standardized electronic clinical data form has not yet been proposed to assess medical renal biopsies.…”

Application of machine learning and its effects on the development of a nursing guidance mobile app for sarcopenia

“…A 2015 survey revealed that approximately 83% of the World Health Organisation’s member states had implemented the use of various applications for patient condition tracking and healthcare support (e.g., reminding patients to take their medications, providing guidance on medication use or healthcare decision-making to patients and caregivers) [ 16 ]. Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly developed in recent years; it is primarily used to predict diseases through machine learning methods, database processing for mining potentially usable information, and discovering trends, characteristics, and relationships in data [ 17 ].…”