2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing specificity of HPV-DNA primary screening in a successful organised cervical cancer prevention programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
12
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high clinical accuracy of E6/E7 mRNA test in female population has been attested by large cross-sectional study [29][30][31], and confirmed by the present findings. To date, there are no data regarding the possible use of E6/E7 mRNA in male population, except for Silling et al [32], which evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mRNA testing in anal sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The high clinical accuracy of E6/E7 mRNA test in female population has been attested by large cross-sectional study [29][30][31], and confirmed by the present findings. To date, there are no data regarding the possible use of E6/E7 mRNA in male population, except for Silling et al [32], which evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mRNA testing in anal sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To limit over-diagnosis, hrHPV-positive women should be stratified with a triage test with high specificity and high PPV for advanced precancerous lesion and equal sensitivity as HPV DNA testing [10,11]. Triaging by cytology would help in the detection of morphologic changes induced by HPV infection; however, specificity and especially sensitivity of cytological triage might still be too low [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La tinción dual p16/Ki67 en citología constituye, por tanto, una de las pruebas más prometedores para identificar lesiones cervicales premalignas [162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170][171] . En la actualidad se han publicado diez estudios en los que, a pesar de las notables diferencias en los criterios de inclusión, se observa una sensibilidad y especificidad muy altas (aproximadamente del 90 y del 80%, respectivamente).…”
Section: Otros Marcadores Molecularesunclassified