2010
DOI: 10.3109/09593981003681046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing one standardized rehabilitation protocol following autologous chondrocyte implantation or microfracture in the knee results in comparable physical therapy management

Abstract: Overall, the compliance post-surgery with the rehabilitation protocol was excellent and the applied rehabilitation was comparable in both treatment groups. A high amount of low-load activities post-surgery appears beneficial for the objective functional outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients were dismissed 1 day after surgery and followed the same standardized phased rehabilitation protocol supervised by their own physiotherapist and adjusted to individual goals . All patients were non weight bearing for 3 weeks with a gradual increase to full weight bearing at 9 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were dismissed 1 day after surgery and followed the same standardized phased rehabilitation protocol supervised by their own physiotherapist and adjusted to individual goals . All patients were non weight bearing for 3 weeks with a gradual increase to full weight bearing at 9 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients were dismissed one day after surgery and followed the same standardized phased rehabilitation protocol supervised by their own physiotherapist and adjusted to individual goals . To ensure correct use if this protocol, a specialised physiotherapist contacted each patient and their physiotherapist prior to starting the protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broad electronic-evidence assimilation could be provided in this manner, embracing a range of peerreviewed journals as opposed to the 2 or 3 that rehabilitators may have access to; compliance management for all parties could also be facilitated by this approach. 54 Adopting a standard protocol and adding the nuances that an evidence-based approach demands may be the future according to Van Assche et al 48 While this will increase the quality of reporting of clinical trials, it may not be productive in the evaluation of optimal rehabilitative practice, as standardizing rehabilitation eliminates variability in study designs. One adaptation based on the characteristics of the patient is timed duration of graded weight bearing, which is regarded as an area where good evidence exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%