2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10072160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Green IT Transformation for Sustainability: A Case Study in China

Abstract: Implementing green Information Technology (IT) is an effective way to realize sustainability. In the process of implementing green IT, IT transformation is essential but tends to fail. However, existing literature can't offer effective guidance for implementing green IT. In this article, we conduct a case study of green IT implementation at Shenyang Aircraft Corporation, an aircraft manufacturer. This study sheds light on the process through which green IT transformation and sustainability are achieved. Conseq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that numerous IT applications would have a positive impact on sustainability (Molla et al, 2014), the notion of green IT has often been manifested in a myriad of terms such as green IS (Watson et al, 2010), IS for environmental sustainability (Melville, 2010), and environmental sustainability of IT (Elliot, 2011). Against this background, Zeng et al (2018) have taken a comprehensive perspective to conceptualize GITS, namely, any integration and cooperation of efficiently and effectively designing, manufacturing, utilizing, and disposing of computers, servers, and other associated subsystems to enhance environmental sustainability. This conceptualization, in turn, shares much similarity with Molla and Abareshi's (2012) definition of GITS, which refers to those managerial efforts and activities aimed at pollution prevention, product stewardship, and sustainable development through minimizing the negative environmental impacts of IT equipment over its entire life cycle.…”
Section: Green It Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that numerous IT applications would have a positive impact on sustainability (Molla et al, 2014), the notion of green IT has often been manifested in a myriad of terms such as green IS (Watson et al, 2010), IS for environmental sustainability (Melville, 2010), and environmental sustainability of IT (Elliot, 2011). Against this background, Zeng et al (2018) have taken a comprehensive perspective to conceptualize GITS, namely, any integration and cooperation of efficiently and effectively designing, manufacturing, utilizing, and disposing of computers, servers, and other associated subsystems to enhance environmental sustainability. This conceptualization, in turn, shares much similarity with Molla and Abareshi's (2012) definition of GITS, which refers to those managerial efforts and activities aimed at pollution prevention, product stewardship, and sustainable development through minimizing the negative environmental impacts of IT equipment over its entire life cycle.…”
Section: Green It Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It consists of three main components: economic, environmental, and social sustainability, known as the "triple bottom line" [6]. Economic sustainability is created by producing various goods and services in a responsible manner.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research work by Daqing Zheng established linkages between organizational theories of green information technology and information systems as technologies that can reduce energy consumption and carbon footprints in computer systems and other business operation (Zheng 2010;Khor et al 2015). To easily understand the differences between the IT, information and communication technology (ICT), Green IT, IS and Green information technology systems (ITS) terminologies, the authors have provided several definitions below (Table 1) to differentiate them from one another comprehensively and further highlighted the technical variations between them in Table 2 (Zeng et al 2018). Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%