2021
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4605654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing FAIR Digital Objects in the EOSC-Life Workflow Collaboratory

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Workflows are further described with authors, license, diagram previews and a listing of their inputs and outputs. RO-Crates can thus be used for interoperable deposition of workflows to WorkflowHub, but are also used as an archive for downloading workflows, embedding metadata registered with the WorkflowHub entry and translated workflow files such as abstract Common Workflow Language (CWL) [36] definitions and diagrams [56].…”
Section: Profile For Describing Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Workflows are further described with authors, license, diagram previews and a listing of their inputs and outputs. RO-Crates can thus be used for interoperable deposition of workflows to WorkflowHub, but are also used as an archive for downloading workflows, embedding metadata registered with the WorkflowHub entry and translated workflow files such as abstract Common Workflow Language (CWL) [36] definitions and diagrams [56].…”
Section: Profile For Describing Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RO-Crate acts therefore as an interoperability layer between registries, repositories and users in Work-flowHub. The iterative development between WorkflowHub developers and the RO-Crate community heavily informed the creation of the Bioschemas [58] profile for Computational Workflows, 54 which again informed the RO-Crate 1.1 specification on workflows 55 and led to the RO-Crate Python library [41] and WorkflowHub's Workflow RO-Crate profile, 56 which, in a similar fashion to RO-Crate itself, recommends which workflow resources and descriptions are required. This co-development across project boundaries exemplifies the drive for simplicity and for establishing best practices.…”
Section: Profile For Describing Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tools of particular interest span the fields of computer vision, optical character recognition, handwriting recognition, named entity recognition and language translation. Workflow technologies from the ELIXIR Research Infrastructure [19], including Galaxy [20], Common Workflow Language [21], Research Object Crates (RO-Crates) [22,23] and WorkflowHub [24], and selected tools are integrated in a cloud-based workflow platform for natural history specimens-the 'Specimen Data Refinery' [1] that will become one of the main services to be offered by the planned DiSSCo research infrastructure [5]. The tools themselves, implemented with findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) characteristics [25] are packaged into canonical workflow component libraries [26], rendering them reusable, and interoperable with one another.…”
Section: The Specimen Data Refi Nery: a Canonical Workfl Ow Framework...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…openDS is essential to future FAIR digitization of natural history collections and to Digital Specimens as self-standing digital objects on the Internet, amenable to computer processing. It contributes to the new transformative generation of FAIR infrastructure and applications based on Digital Object Architecture that is planned for the Distributed System of Scientific Collections (DiSSCo) [6,24,29] European research infrastructure.…”
Section: Co Mputable Digital Specimens As a Kind Of Fair Digital Objectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation