2016
DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286.60757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing European Standards in the Esp Curriculum for Students of Non-Linguistic Specialities in Ukrainian Universities

Abstract: The article presents the current tendencies in teaching English for Specific Purposes (ESP) for students of nonlinguistic specialities in the European context. The author analyses the requirements of English language proficiency set by the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), in the context of European integration processes. The National ESP Curriculum for Universities (2005) focuses on the necessity to acquire professional and functional communicative competence in English by the gradu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Athanasiou et al (2016), while the ESP syllabus requires expertise in terms of the discourse related to each course, the selection of material is a painstaking process which is further aggravated with its alignment with a specific language level. In a similar fashion, Grytsyk (2016) explores the positive outcomes of the CEFR in the ESP curriculum in Ukrainian higher educational institutions, obtaining favourable results; as she states, "[t]he implementation of International English Tests into the process of teaching ESP in accordance with CEFR will undoubtedly lead to positive changes and transformations of the foreign language education" (Grytsyk, 2016, p. 8). Buyukkalay (2017) approaches the CEFR from a different angle in her study; the author examines the effect of CEFR-based ESP speaking and listening activities on the success of students in the Faculty of Tourism, reporting an increase in the achievement levels of the students in the aforementioned skills.…”
Section: Cefr Esp and Callmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Athanasiou et al (2016), while the ESP syllabus requires expertise in terms of the discourse related to each course, the selection of material is a painstaking process which is further aggravated with its alignment with a specific language level. In a similar fashion, Grytsyk (2016) explores the positive outcomes of the CEFR in the ESP curriculum in Ukrainian higher educational institutions, obtaining favourable results; as she states, "[t]he implementation of International English Tests into the process of teaching ESP in accordance with CEFR will undoubtedly lead to positive changes and transformations of the foreign language education" (Grytsyk, 2016, p. 8). Buyukkalay (2017) approaches the CEFR from a different angle in her study; the author examines the effect of CEFR-based ESP speaking and listening activities on the success of students in the Faculty of Tourism, reporting an increase in the achievement levels of the students in the aforementioned skills.…”
Section: Cefr Esp and Callmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ukrainian scholar N. Grytsyk suggests incorporation the International English Tests in the ESP programs for students of nonlinguistic specialties, providing every Bachelor's graduate with equal amount of English classes, development of teaching resource etc. for meeting the European standards of ESP teaching (Grytsyk, 2016). Supporting N. Grytsyk's ideas, we can add, that students' interests and needs of their personal development should not be ignored as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Ukrainian researchers (Chesnokova, Sergeyeva, 2011, Grytsyk, 2016 claim that the level of foreign language proficiency of many first-year students is inadequate, especially those majoring in the fields other than Humanities. The problem is that the students often lack the required B1 level of English according to the Common European Reference for Languages (CEFR, 2018), which is determined by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine as a standard of English for school leavers, and demonstrate A1 or A2 levels instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%