2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10956-018-9751-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Engineering in Diverse Upper Elementary and Middle School Science Classrooms: Student Learning and Attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the impact of E 2 on engineering identity was positive overall, the magnitude of the effect was low for each of the three grade levels. Given that past research is mixed, with several studies showing no impact on attitudes and identity development for students receiving integrated SE instruction (e.g., Lie et al, 2019; Wendell & Rogers, 2013), the positive effect is noteworthy. Further, the effect sizes observed were within the range of those reported by year‐long interventions such as Capobianco et al’s (2017, partial n 2 from 0.027 to 0.144) and Yoon et al’s (2014, partial n 2 from 0.038 to 0.178).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the impact of E 2 on engineering identity was positive overall, the magnitude of the effect was low for each of the three grade levels. Given that past research is mixed, with several studies showing no impact on attitudes and identity development for students receiving integrated SE instruction (e.g., Lie et al, 2019; Wendell & Rogers, 2013), the positive effect is noteworthy. Further, the effect sizes observed were within the range of those reported by year‐long interventions such as Capobianco et al’s (2017, partial n 2 from 0.027 to 0.144) and Yoon et al’s (2014, partial n 2 from 0.038 to 0.178).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It may also indicate differences in opportunity reinforced by under‐trained teachers. In a recent study examining predictors of SE content learning and identity development, Lie et al (2019) found that teachers who had 2 years of professional development in integrated SE instruction predicted student attitudes toward engineering. Teachers in the study reported here received 8 hours of training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, inconsistent studies are conducted at a level above elementary school. An examination of each study reveals that a number of studies declare positive impacts of STEM techniques on student views (Aranda, Guzey, & Moore, 2020;French & Burrows, 2018;Lie, Selcen Guzey, & Moore, 2019;Nathan, Wolfgram, Srisurichan, Walkington, & Alibali, 2017;Vance, Kulturel -Kona k, & Konak, 2015;Wieselmann, Dare, Roehrig, & Ring-Whalen, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, another assessment designed by Cunningham and colleagues asked students to identify objects and activities as technology and engineering, respectively [3]. Some assessment tools test students' knowledge of the engineering design process [4], [5]. Additionally, researchers often administer engineering attitude surveys that gauge students' conceptions of themselves and their participation in engineering [4], [6], [7], [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some assessment tools test students' knowledge of the engineering design process [4], [5]. Additionally, researchers often administer engineering attitude surveys that gauge students' conceptions of themselves and their participation in engineering [4], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Outside of these research-oriented assessments, there exists a governmental effort to assess engineering thinking and design literacy at the fourth and eighth grade levels from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%