1990
DOI: 10.2307/249785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis revealed a 50% reduction in person hours and a 90% cut in project cycle times over 30 projects, and a triple-digit return on their GSS investment. [34]. Boeing Corporation likewise reported more than 70% savings of labor hours, more than 90% reductions in cycle times, and a triple-digit return on investment for its use of GSS to support concurrent engineering on the 777 project [59].…”
Section: [Figure 4 About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis revealed a 50% reduction in person hours and a 90% cut in project cycle times over 30 projects, and a triple-digit return on their GSS investment. [34]. Boeing Corporation likewise reported more than 70% savings of labor hours, more than 90% reductions in cycle times, and a triple-digit return on investment for its use of GSS to support concurrent engineering on the 777 project [59].…”
Section: [Figure 4 About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBM [34] and Boeing Corporation [59] both worked closely with the research community on proof-of-value studies for GroupSystems. Both companies published papers detailing yearlong studies of GroupSystems use in the field that produced gains ranging from 50% to 90%.…”
Section: [Figure 5 About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of GSS meetings is often attributed to specific GSS characteristics: anonymity, parallel input, and group memory Hiltz 1998-1999). Previous studies have reported a reduction in time and costs of up to 50% , Post 1993-1994, Grohowski et al 1990, Dennis et al 1999, Nunamaker et al 1997. However, some of the disadvantages of focus groups are more difficult to reduce.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under certain conditions, teams using collaboration technology attain 70-90% savings in project cycle times and cut labor hours by 50-70% while improving the quality of their work products [7,9,15,19,24]. These gains, however, were typically only realized in teams lead by expensive collaboration experts such as professional facilitators, so most teams could not attain those benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%