1998
DOI: 10.1177/009102609802700404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Comparable Worth/Pay Equity: Experiences of Cutting-Edge States

Abstract: This article focuses on the experiences of eight states that have implemented comparable worth statutes: Connecticut, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin. Montana did not find any gender-related disparities between its job classes, but each of the other seven states uncovered disparities and remedied them by expending amounts ranging from 1% to 4% of total payroll. Public employee unions are comparable worth/pay equity's most influential political supporters, but union support… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I include the union variable, a categorical representation of whether a state’s employees have the right to collectively bargain, because I expect that the right to bargain would have a positive impact on pay for all groups of women, as suggested by the literature (Gardner & Daniel, 1998; Portman, Grune, & Johnson, 1984). In this case, states with collective bargaining rights in three major areas—firefighting, education, and police—are rated “3,” those with collective bargaining rights in only two areas are rated “2,” those with collective bargaining rights in only one area are rated “1,” and those with no collective bargaining rights are rated “0.”…”
Section: Primary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I include the union variable, a categorical representation of whether a state’s employees have the right to collectively bargain, because I expect that the right to bargain would have a positive impact on pay for all groups of women, as suggested by the literature (Gardner & Daniel, 1998; Portman, Grune, & Johnson, 1984). In this case, states with collective bargaining rights in three major areas—firefighting, education, and police—are rated “3,” those with collective bargaining rights in only two areas are rated “2,” those with collective bargaining rights in only one area are rated “1,” and those with no collective bargaining rights are rated “0.”…”
Section: Primary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also recommended that social workers work with elected and appointed leaders who have shown interest in some form of equal worth legislation (Gibelman, 2003). Social workers can also look to states such as Connecticut, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin to get a better understanding of comparable worth legislation at the state level (Gardner & Daniel, 1998; Killingsworth, 2002). Minnesota in particular has provided data regarding its equal pay efforts to researchers so that its policies may be thoroughly analyzed (Killingsworth, 2002).…”
Section: Call To Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a study of implementation procedures for comparable worth/pay equity policies found that seven out of eight states had gender-related disparities which they remedied through payroll adjustments for individuals or entire female-dominated job classes. The most influential factor in the implementation of comparable worth/pay equity was public employee unions (Gardner and Daniel 1998). Unions also play an important role in the frequency of public sector work stoppages.…”
Section: Private Sector Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%