2003
DOI: 10.1093/phr/118.4.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Community-Campus Partnerships in South Carolina: Collaborative Efforts to Improve Public Health

Abstract: Collaboration between schools of public health and communities is essential to creating healthier communities. Community-Campus Partnerships for Health has established a policy agenda that recognizes the importance of supporting the connection of community engagement with the traditional components of the mission of academic institutions: teaching, research, and service. 1 "Communities" have been defined by Green, Daniel, and Novick as not only localities but also "groups that have a common interest or cause e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such partnerships involve "a close mutual cooperation between parties having common interests, responsibilities, privileges and power" (Campus-Community Partnerships for Health, 2006) and can build trust between communities and universities to codefine strategies needed for improving overall community health. These partnerships have been beneficial to the schools' students and faculty as well as to community centers at the local and state levels (Richter, Gimarc, Preston, & Williams, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such partnerships involve "a close mutual cooperation between parties having common interests, responsibilities, privileges and power" (Campus-Community Partnerships for Health, 2006) and can build trust between communities and universities to codefine strategies needed for improving overall community health. These partnerships have been beneficial to the schools' students and faculty as well as to community centers at the local and state levels (Richter, Gimarc, Preston, & Williams, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these collaborative activities are wide-ranging (emergency preparedness, 3,4 disease prevention and control, [5][6][7][8] reducing health disparities, 9 hospices, 10 minority health, 11 minority workforce recruitment, 12,13 rural health, 14,15 maternal and child health, 16 environmental health, 17,18 education, research, and service, [19][20][21][22][23] and so on), they do not provide a holistic or systems view of academic institution-public health agency (academic-agency) partnerships. Most assessments of these relationships have been conducted by public health academic institutions and primarily reflect the faculties' own reports of success, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] as do recent assessments involving schools of nursing [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] and medicine. [45][46][47] Third-party evaluation is rare, and little is known of what the leaders of health agencies think about the value of these partnerships to the...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%