Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics

Abstract

This article investigates the perspectives of Romanian academics on implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Higher Education (HE). The article analyzes the pros and cons of AI in HE, based on the views of eighteen academics from five Romanian universities. There is a large and heated debate about the proliferation of AI in many domains, with strong supporters and determined deniers. Studies that research the implications of AI enrich the evidence-based literature on the advantages, disadvantages, threats, or opportunities that AI creates for us, for businesses, or for societies. Though many aspects are still less well known, attitudes toward AI are still under construction. HE is a domain where the implications of AI create passionate discussions. HE is, eventually, the sector that shapes the masterminds of societies’ leaders. There is a quest to find the perspectives of those who will apply AI, who will work with or for AI, and those who are opposed to or in favor of implementing AI in HE. The conclusions revealed by this study are in line with similar studies that exist in the literature. The positive aspects of AI implementation in HE are related, in the view of academics, to gains in the learning–teaching process, improvements in students skills and competences, better inclusion, and greater efficiency in administrative costs. Similarly, the negative aspects revealed by the research are linked to psychosocial effects, data security, ethical aspects, and unemployment threats. However, there are some aspects (mostly negative) related to implementing AI in HE that are less exposed by the interviewed academics, which are mostly related to the costs and efforts of implementing AI in HE. The possible explanation of this situation is related to the lack of strategic vision on what, in fact, the implementation of AI in HE means, what this process involves, and the fact that digitalization in Romanian universities (as well as in the Romanian economy) is in its infancy. The contribution of the results of this research is mainly empirical and practical. These opinions should be used as resources for managers of HE institutions to develop better policies concerning the implementation of AI in HE and for strategic vision toward AI, with the ultimate purpose of achieving progress and prosperity for the entire society.

Analyzing the Possibilities of Implementation of AI and Social Networks in Teaching Foreign Language Students: Ukrainian Universities Case Study

“…Studies such as the one conducted by Barnes (2013) explored the role of social networks in language learning, specifically focusing on their impact on student engagement and interaction. The researchers conducted surveys and interviews to analyze how platforms like Facebook and Twitter were utilized to create collaborative language learning communities, providing valuable insights into the potential benefits and challenges of social networks in language education, the change of fundamental structures in university society, and the formation of a new research agenda in higher education (Bearman et al, 2022); increasing efficiency in educational (teaching and learning processes) and research activities and development of new skills (Pisica et al, 2023;Bearman et al, 2022;Times Higher Education, 2023;Chu et al, 2022); the change in accountability at all levels of the educational and research process (Bearman et al, 2023); high prediction quality with many input variables and recommendations based on student characteristics, improving student academic performance and improving online processes (Ouyang et al, 2022;Salas-Pilco & Yang, 2022).…”

Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Naruto Fan Fiction Writing: A Case Study

“…Weaknesses of using AI in education are insufficient deep understanding, difficulties in assessing the quality of answers, risk of bias and discrimination, lack of higher level thinking skills (Farrokhnia et al, 2023), safety and ethical aspects, socio-psychological consequences, loss of the feeling of "being a person," a kind of fear of dissolution of people as social beings, lack of opportunity for countries with less the digitalized economy of the introduction of AI (Pisica et al, 2023), undecided questions about the environmental costs of processing vast amounts of data and transmission of human tasks to machines, including writing texts (Drach et al, 2023).…”

Students Attitude and Behavior towards Circular Economy to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals

“…The behavior of university students includes their actions to practice circular economy principles in daily life, participation in projects related to sustainable development, or support for initiatives that promote the SDGs. University students, during their studies, are exposed to a variety of knowledge and experiences that can shape their views (Pisica et al, 2023;Trinder & Herles, 2013). In the context of the circular economy and sustainable development issues, the teaching and education they receive play an important role in shaping their attitudes and behaviour (Başalan Iz, 2023;Natalia et al, 2023).…”