2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.i010625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing and Validating Air Passenger–Centric Metrics Using Mobile Phone Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from WiFi hotspots and Bluetooth beacons, along with historical data, are used to analyze passenger behavior at airports ( Nikoue et al, 2015 ; Huang et al, 2019 ) and at transit stations ( Van den Heuvel et al, 2016 ). If available, data generated by passengers smartphone and collected by phone carriers can be processed to analyze the door-to-door behavior of passengers ( Marzuoli et al, 2019 , Marzuoli et al, 2018 ; García-Albertos et al, 2017 ), both under nominal and degraded conditions. However data gathered directly from smartphones are proprietary data and are not often publicly available for research.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from WiFi hotspots and Bluetooth beacons, along with historical data, are used to analyze passenger behavior at airports ( Nikoue et al, 2015 ; Huang et al, 2019 ) and at transit stations ( Van den Heuvel et al, 2016 ). If available, data generated by passengers smartphone and collected by phone carriers can be processed to analyze the door-to-door behavior of passengers ( Marzuoli et al, 2019 , Marzuoli et al, 2018 ; García-Albertos et al, 2017 ), both under nominal and degraded conditions. However data gathered directly from smartphones are proprietary data and are not often publicly available for research.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be split into two component: a processing time t sec necessary to get through security and through the airport to the desired gate and an extra wait time t wait due to flight delays. The processing times are based on the average wait times at airports presented in the study of [12]. They are summarized in the following table: The extra wait times are based on the data published by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) [20] and were calculated only for departure.…”
Section: B Dwell Time At Airportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger scale studies with a focus on air transportation was later possible thanks to the increasing use of mobile phone devices as datasources. In the United States, Marzuoli et al [12] presented a method to detect domestic air passengers on a nationwide scale using mobile phone data, enabling a per leg analysis of the full door-to-door trip though the main focus was on passengers' behavior at airports. The passengers' experience in airports under major perturbations using this method and additional data from social media was further studied in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the method of passenger selection validated in [27] is implemented and analyzed for the time period covering the bomb cyclone.…”
Section: Bomb Cyclone From Mobile Location Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools are implemented and tested a posteriori in the case of the bomb cyclone that hit the Northeast part of the United States in January 2018, causing the closure of Kennedy International Airport (JFK) and severe capacity decreases at Logan International Airport (BOS), Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) and LaGuardia Airport (LGA). The passenger mobility perspective is based on a previous experimental proof [27] that mobile phone data enables the identification of domestic air passengers and supports the analysis of their behavior, under both nominal and degraded conditions. Combined with a passenger social media behavior perspective, these two analysis yield a better understanding of the impact of this bomb cyclone than the traditional flight-centric data coming from the BTS database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%