2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.02.870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing and evaluating a sustainable early child development program in Limpopo, South Africa: A pilot study

Abstract: asked to report on expansion of partnership opportunities through GEMx. Outcomes & Evaluation:Based on their responses to open-ended questions, the participating partner schools indicated that the GEMx application system could be useful in promoting transparency because schools can promote the exchange opportunities they provide. Two schools formed new partnerships during the initial phase of GEMx. While virtual meetings could be used for information sharing, face-toface meetings were thought to increase famil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process was repeated for the full‐text screening (SM screened all records; CR, LMW, ST, PL, and ME independently double screened the records; YL resolved discrepancies). When the full text was required but not accessible ( n = 3), 32 , 33 , 34 the authors were contacted for further information. Two responses confirmed the abstracts were outside the review scope, and one did not receive a response, and no information was available in English, so it was also excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This process was repeated for the full‐text screening (SM screened all records; CR, LMW, ST, PL, and ME independently double screened the records; YL resolved discrepancies). When the full text was required but not accessible ( n = 3), 32 , 33 , 34 the authors were contacted for further information. Two responses confirmed the abstracts were outside the review scope, and one did not receive a response, and no information was available in English, so it was also excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the full text was required but not accessible (n = 3), [32][33][34] the authors were contacted for further information. Two responses confirmed the abstracts were outside the review scope, and one did not receive a response, and no information was available in English, so it was also excluded.…”
Section: Selection Processmentioning
confidence: 99%