2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-015-0305-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing an evidence-based breast cancer support and communication tool to newly diagnosed patients as standard care in two institutions

Abstract: While many women turn to the Internet to obtain health information, it is unlikely that unstructured Internet use provides optimal benefit to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, due to uneven quality, conflicting claims, redundancy, and search engine idiosyncrasies, which may make finding information and assessing its accuracy and applicability difficult. To answer the need for information and support, the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS) was developed to provide access to integrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These concessions ultimately made the program flexible to accommodate all needs yet standardized enough to be implemented in a uniform manner across all sites. This occurrence has been recognized by others during implementation of clinic-focused programs (Rahm et al, 2015; Stevens, Smith, Trickett, & McGhee, 2012). A crucial step was engaging medical leadership to address their concerns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…These concessions ultimately made the program flexible to accommodate all needs yet standardized enough to be implemented in a uniform manner across all sites. This occurrence has been recognized by others during implementation of clinic-focused programs (Rahm et al, 2015; Stevens, Smith, Trickett, & McGhee, 2012). A crucial step was engaging medical leadership to address their concerns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A controlled study should be used to measure improvement in QoL. Yet attributing improvement to particular system functionality necessitates large cohorts partitioned into groups receiving different app versions or a study in which different features are exposed over time, or even several studies (e.g., as for the CHESS system where different trials were conducted to assess the impact of several combinations of patient-oriented support [152]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though BCS turn to alternative sources for OET-related information, these sources may not provide adequate benefit due to uneven quality, conflicting claims, redundancy, and difficulties associated with assessing information accuracy and applicability. 31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%