Implementing a Virtual Community of Practice for Family Physician Training: A Mixed-Methods Case Study

Abstract

BackgroundGP training in Australia can be professionally isolating, with trainees spread across large geographic areas, leading to problems with rural workforce retention. Virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) may provide a way of improving knowledge sharing and thus reducing professional isolation.ObjectiveThe goal of our study was to review the usefulness of a 7-step framework for implementing a VCoP for general practitioner (GP) training and then evaluated the usefulness of the resulting VCoP in facilitating knowledge sharing and reducing professional isolation.MethodsThe case was set in an Australian general practice training region involving 55 first-term trainees (GPT1s), from January to July 2012. ConnectGPR was a secure, online community site that included standard community options such as discussion forums, blogs, newsletter broadcasts, webchats, and photo sharing. A mixed-methods case study methodology was used. Results are presented and interpreted for each step of the VCoP 7-step framework and then in terms of the outcomes of knowledge sharing and overcoming isolation.ResultsStep 1, Facilitation: Regular, personal facilitation by a group of GP trainers with a co-ordinating facilitator was an important factor in the success of ConnectGPR. Step 2, Champion and Support: Leadership and stakeholder engagement were vital. Further benefits are possible if the site is recognized as contributing to training time. Step 3, Clear Goals: Clear goals of facilitating knowledge sharing and improving connectedness helped to keep the site discussions focused. Step 4, A Broad Church: The ConnectGPR community was too narrow, focusing only on first-term trainees (GPT1s). Ideally there should be more involvement of senior trainees, trainers, and specialists. Step 5, A Supportive Environment: Facilitators maintained community standards and encouraged participation. Step 6, Measurement Benchmarking and Feedback: Site activity was primarily driven by centrally generated newsletter feedback. Viewing comments by other participants helped users benchmark their own knowledge, particularly around applying guidelines. Step 7, Technology and Community: All the community tools were useful, but chat was limited and users suggested webinars in future. A larger user base and more training may also be helpful. Time is a common barrier. Trust can be built online, which may have benefit for trainees that cannot attend face-to-face workshops. Knowledge sharing and isolation outcomes: 28/34 (82%) of the eligible GPT1s enrolled on ConnectGPR. Trainees shared knowledge through online chat, forums, and shared photos. In terms of knowledge needs, GPT1s rated their need for cardiovascular knowledge more highly than supervisors. Isolation was a common theme among interview respondents, and ConnectGPR users felt more supported in their general practice (13/14, 92.9%).ConclusionsThe 7-step framework for implementation of an online community was useful. Overcoming isolation and improving connectedness through an online knowledge sharing community...

Theory, a lost character? As presented in general practice education research papers

“…Adult learning theory was used as a vehicle for the idea of learner‐centredness . Experiential learning was used as a vehicle for learning in the context of doing, and communities of practice theory was used as a vehicle for the idea of people working together with a common purpose …”

“…Barnett et al used communities of practice as a vehicle for the idea of a group with a common purpose…”

“…47,48 Experiential learning was used as a vehicle for learning in the context of doing, 40,49 and communities of practice theory was used as a vehicle for the idea of people working together with a common purpose. [50][51][52][53] Theory providing a methodological tool Some authors gave theory the task of introducing or crafting methodological tools. These included tools for collecting data, tools for typology and tools for analysis.…”

A Computer-Assisted, Real-Time Feedback System for Medical Students as a Tool for Web-Based Learning

“…[11][12][13][14][15][16] Moodle has been continuously evolving as an open-source environment since it was first developed for web-based learning in 1998; it has been applied to medical education in some instances. 17,18 The automated, real-time feedback system in this study was developed on the Moodle platform; Students who participated in this study also received different feedback depending on the grade obtained on the quiz.…”

Perceptions of competency‐based medical education from medical student discussion forums

“…Online discussion forums have recently become a research tool for insight into various topics in medical education . Forums are digital open‐access platforms where posters from various levels of training can participate anonymously.…”