Implementing a software configuration management environment

Buckley, Fletcher J.

doi:10.1109/2.261926

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One part of the SCM is a planning activity that forms an SCM plan [38]. The basic idea of the SCM plan is to define who is going to do what, when, where and how in relation to the configuration management [39]. When applied to the context of CO-SLM the goal is to help a consortium of public sector organizations to define what to manage, who will do the management, how the management will be done and how to finance the management and further development of a software product.…”

Section: Framework For Community-based Lifecycle Planning (Co-slm Fra...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Lifecycle management in government-driven open source projects – practical framework

Henttonen

Kääriäinen

Kylmäaho

2022

IJISPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In many parts of the world, public sector organizations are increasingly interested in collaborating across organizational (and even national) boundaries to develop software solutions under an open licence. However, without sound lifecycle management practices, the full benefits of open collaboration are not achieved and projects fail to achieve sustained success. This paper introduces a lifecycle management model and framework for government-driven open-source projects and reports about its use in a real-life case study. Our focus is on lifecycle management activities which take place between deployment and end-of-life. The framework was developed iteratively through a series of focus group discussions with representatives of public sector organizations. After the framework had been taken into use in our real-life case project, individual qualitative interviews were conducted to collect experiences on its benefits and weaknesses. According to the initial evidence, the deployment of the framework seems to have brought concrete benefits to the project, e.g. by contributing positively to community growth, software quality and inter-organizational learning.

show abstract

Section: Framework For Community-based Lifecycle Planning (Co-slm Fra...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Lifecycle management in government-driven open source projects – practical framework

Henttonen

Kääriäinen

Kylmäaho

2022

IJISPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In particular, it implements the basic functionality of a Configuration Management Environment: Version Control, Check-in/Check-out and Buffered Compare Program [BUC94]. The Version Control function stores the change history concerning the system (i.e.…”

Section: Information Management Componentmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Design Rationale Based Environment for Cooperative Maintenance

Casazza

Lucia

2000

Int. J. Soft. Eng. Knowl. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes Cooperative Maintenance Conceptual Model (CM 2 ), a conceptual model aimed at supporting software maintenance in a collaborative fashion. The main goal of CM 2 is to support the software maintenance process through the acquisition, structuring and distribution of the information concerned with the maintenance process itself. Information is structured as a network of linked comments and concerns both the analysis and design activities (Rationale in the Large) and the implementation of a change (Rationale in the Small). We also present COMANCHE (COoperative MAintenance Network Centered Hypertextual Enviroment), an enviroment which reflects the CM 2 ideas and principles. Int. J. Soft. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 2000.10:627-645. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND on 08/16/15. For personal use only. Int. J. Soft. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 2000.10:627-645. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND on 08/16/15. For personal use only.

show abstract

“…Recomenda-se que estes planos sejam estudados e que seja escolhido como base naquele que tenha maior compatibilidade com o projeto para o qual o plano esteja sendo elaborado [Buckley, 1993]. Um exemplo pode ser encontrado no Padrão 828 da IEEE [IEEE Std 828,1998] que sugere que o plano seja dividido em seis classes de informação, como é mostrado no Quadro 3.1.…”

Section: Implementação Do Processounclassified

Processos de apoio ao desenvolvimento de aplicações web

Souza¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implementing a software configuration management environment

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Lifecycle management in government-driven open source projects – practical framework

Lifecycle management in government-driven open source projects – practical framework

A Design Rationale Based Environment for Cooperative Maintenance

Processos de apoio ao desenvolvimento de aplicações web

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About