Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction and Environmental Issues; Strain Based D 2016
DOI: 10.1115/ipc2016-64580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing a Quantitative Geohazard Frequency Analysis Framework as a Component of Risk Assessment of New Pipelines

Abstract: In the last 5 years in Canada, regulators have been requesting that new pipeline projects provide quantitative risk management of all credible geohazards involving the proposed pipeline corridor so it can be demonstrated that geohazards are being recognized prioritized and that adequate resources are being allocated and to minimize the impact of adverse consequences of pipeline construction and operation. Complete risk management includes risk analysis that identifies credible geohazards sites, estimates their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the probability throughout the project life cycle, frequency analyses of the risks highlighted concerning the proposed project have been done. Risk frequencies were assessed based on the study of historical accident frequency data and professionally evaluated in respect to the proposed project [29]. The following frequency categories and criteria were created based on the range of possibilities for distinct possible dangers during pipeline operations related to the proposed project (Table 1).…”
Section: Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the probability throughout the project life cycle, frequency analyses of the risks highlighted concerning the proposed project have been done. Risk frequencies were assessed based on the study of historical accident frequency data and professionally evaluated in respect to the proposed project [29]. The following frequency categories and criteria were created based on the range of possibilities for distinct possible dangers during pipeline operations related to the proposed project (Table 1).…”
Section: Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%