23rd Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference 1998
DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-4344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementations of parallel grid assembly for moving body problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the phase II implementation Prewitt et al 10 showed an improvement in the parallel ef ciency by hiding the execution time of the grid assembly function behind that of the ow solver. This was possible because of the Newton-relaxation scheme used in the ow solver (complete details on the ow solver can be found in the literature; see Whit eld, 11 for example).…”
Section: Parallel Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the phase II implementation Prewitt et al 10 showed an improvement in the parallel ef ciency by hiding the execution time of the grid assembly function behind that of the ow solver. This was possible because of the Newton-relaxation scheme used in the ow solver (complete details on the ow solver can be found in the literature; see Whit eld, 11 for example).…”
Section: Parallel Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prewitt et al 10 presented the rst implementation,phase I, which used a single front-end (FE) process to perform the grid assembly in a serial fashion with respect to the parallel execution of the ow solver across multiple backend (BE) processes. Proper communication between the ow solver and the grid assembly function was required; however, no considerationwas given to load balancing or partitioning of the grid assembly function.…”
Section: Parallel Implementationsmentioning
confidence: 99%