Implementation Science for Managers and Healthcare Organizations Responding to Emergencies

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to illustrate how implementation science concepts and methods can be applied by researchers and implementers to understand and assist emergency management in a large primary and community healthcare organization. The article refers to a single-case implementation action evaluation of an emergency management system in a healthcare organization. It describes the methods used in this study and findings to explain how a joint healthcare and university research team were able to use the science and methods both to help implementation and contribute to science. We report two sets of findings. First, findings about implementation of emergency management to illustrate how the investigation adapted implementation science and concepts to achieve the objectives evaluation. We discovered that implementation science provides useful concepts to understand contextual factors and adds to knowledge about organizational change and emergency management in the uncertain and evolving situation we encountered. The second set of findings are the strengths and limitations of both implementation science and the action evaluation methods we used to achieve the dual objectives of practical help with implementation and to contribute to science. The article uses the first implementation action evaluation study of the response of large public primary and community healthcare organization to a pandemic to illustrate how implementation science can be applied. This type of study was able to improve implementation of the response as well as contribute to scientific knowledge about emergency healthcare management and organization.

Implementation Methods and Research for a Post-truth World with Growing Inequities

“…Together we wrote an ethics application and flexible protocol for rapid implementation evaluation research, which was fast tracked, approved and started within 2 weeks. The programme so far has led to nine sub-projects and six peer reviewed publications, and reduced suffering and lowered costs through the faster and more effective implementation of management and organisation innovations (Ovretveit & Ohrling, 2021 ; Øvretveit, 2021 ).…”