Implementation research for ‘evidence‐based’ guideline development by dietitians: a pilot study to test an instrument

Wammes, Birgitte; Blom, C.A.; Koelen, M.A.; Groot, S.D.W. de; Remijnse-Meester, W.T.A.; Staveren, W.A. van

doi:10.1046/j.1365-277x.2002.00368.x

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To facilitate CPGs/consensus statement implementation, pilot studies and/or barrier analysis 45 may identify facilitators and barriers to implementation. 44 46 47 Feedback from stakeholders and users could also be informative and help to improve the incorporation of CPGs/consensus statements. Furthermore, widely accepted resource-stratified CPGs/consensus statements would be helpful.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of guidelines regarding surgical treatment of breast cancer using the AGREE Instrument: a systematic review

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesMany clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements (CPGs/consensus statements) have been developed for the surgical treatments for breast cancer. This study aims to evaluate the quality of these CPGs/consensus statements.MethodsWe systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases, as well as four guideline repositories, to identify CPGs and consensus statements regarding surgical treatments for breast cancer between January 2009 and December 2016. We used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument to assess the quality of the CPGs and consensus statements included. The overall assessment scores from the AGREE instrument and radar maps were used to evaluate the overall quality. We also evaluated some factors that may affect the quality of CPGs and consensus statements using the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis H test. All analyses were performed using SPSS V.19.0. This systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.ResultsA total of 19 CPGs and four consensus statements were included. In general, the included CPGs/consensus statements (n=23) performed well in the ‘Scope and Purpose’ and ‘Clarity and Presentation’ domains, but performed poorly in the ‘Applicability’ domain. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG) and Belgium Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) guidelines had the highest overall quality, whereas the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) guidelines and the D.A.C.H and European School of Oncology (ESO) consensus statements had the lowest overall quality. The updating frequency of CPGs/consensus statements varied, with the quality of consensus statements generally lower than that of CPGs. A total of six, eight and five CPGs were developed in the North American, European and Asian/Pacific regions, respectively. However, geographic region was not associated with overall quality.ConclusionsThe ASCO, NICE, SIGN, NZGG and KCE guidelines had the best overall quality, and the quality of consensus statements was generally lower than that of CPGs. More efforts are needed to identify barriers and facilitators for CPGs/consensus statement implementation and to improve their applicability.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of guidelines regarding surgical treatment of breast cancer using the AGREE Instrument: a systematic review

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Sistema de clasificación de los estudios en función de la evidencia científica. Dietética y Nutrición Aplicada Basadas en la Evidencia (DNABE): una herramienta para el dietista-nutricionista del futuro

Baladía¹,

Basulto

2008

Actividad Dietética

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Antibiograms: Hospitals, Part 1 Pharmaceutical Care in Japan Practice Guideline Implementation

Generali¹

2004

Hospital Pharmacy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To help readers monitor the most important developments in specialized areas of pharmacy practice in organized health systems, Hospital Pharmacy commissions Basic Bibliographies by guest editors, who have expertise in their respective fields. These guest editors survey the relevant literature and rank approximately 15 to 20 references that represent the most significant research and practice contributions in their areas. The more fundamental are listed first so that persons with limited time can select reading appropriate to their needs. A cumulative index to Basic Bibliography topics will be published semiannually in June and December.

show abstract

Implementation research for ‘evidence‐based’ guideline development by dietitians: a pilot study to test an instrument

Abstract: We concluded that the applied questionnaire is appropriate for implementation research and has given a structured overview of factors that influence the development of dietetic guidelines by dietitians in the UMCU.

Cited by 4 publications

References 7 publications

Evaluation of guidelines regarding surgical treatment of breast cancer using the AGREE Instrument: a systematic review

Evaluation of guidelines regarding surgical treatment of breast cancer using the AGREE Instrument: a systematic review

Sistema de clasificación de los estudios en función de la evidencia científica. Dietética y Nutrición Aplicada Basadas en la Evidencia (DNABE): una herramienta para el dietista-nutricionista del futuro

Antibiograms: Hospitals, Part 1 Pharmaceutical Care in Japan Practice Guideline Implementation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About