2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.62.16392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of the projector augmented-wave LDA+U method: Application to the electronic structure of NiO

Abstract: The so-called local density approximation plus the multi-orbital mean-field Hubbard model (LDA+U) has been implemented within the all-electron projector augmented-wave method (PAW), and then used to compute the insulating antiferromagnetic ground state of NiO and its optical properties. The electronic and optical properties have been investigated as a function of the Coulomb repulsion parameter U . We find that the value obtained from constrained LDA (U = 8 eV) is not the best possible choice, whereas an inter… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
369
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 538 publications
(393 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(79 reference statements)
16
369
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For such materials the many electrons in partially filled d or f orbitals are inherently localized on each metal atom and by introducing the on-site Coulomb repulsion U, applied to localized electrons such as 3d or 4f , i.e., a DFT+U approach, results are improved [55][56][57][58]. Two commonly used methods for treating strongly correlated electron materials, are through empirical fitting or constrained DFT calculations [59][60][61][62]. The former method lacks a theoretical basis and is influenced by a limited or non-existing amount of experimental data, whereas the latter approach is motivated from first-principles but of questionable accuracy due to the artificial nature of the constrained system [54].…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such materials the many electrons in partially filled d or f orbitals are inherently localized on each metal atom and by introducing the on-site Coulomb repulsion U, applied to localized electrons such as 3d or 4f , i.e., a DFT+U approach, results are improved [55][56][57][58]. Two commonly used methods for treating strongly correlated electron materials, are through empirical fitting or constrained DFT calculations [59][60][61][62]. The former method lacks a theoretical basis and is influenced by a limited or non-existing amount of experimental data, whereas the latter approach is motivated from first-principles but of questionable accuracy due to the artificial nature of the constrained system [54].…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83 However, several reports in the literature indicate that these U's are too large. 71,96,97 More recent studies employing the linear-response approach 84,85 or the constrained random-phase approximation ͑RPA͒ ͑Refs. 90 and 98͒ yield significantly smaller U's.…”
Section: A Determination Of Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22,23,24,25 This is due to the mean-field character of the Kohn-Sham equations and the poor description of the strong Coulomb correlation and exchange interaction between electrons in narrow d bands (viz. the potential U ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%