2011
DOI: 10.1002/nme.3166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of the Jäger contact model for discrete element simulations

Abstract: SUMMARYIn three-dimensional discrete element method (DEM) simulations, the particle motions within a granular assembly can produce bewildering sequences of movements at the contacts between particle pairs. With frictional contacts, the relationship between contact movement and force is non-linear and path-dependent, requiring an efficient means of computing the forces and storing their histories. By cleverly applying the principles of Cattaneo, Mindlin, and Deresiewicz, Jürgen Jäger developed an efficient appr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such implementations do not permit frictional dissipation in the form of 29 micro-slip and can result in an unfortunate and physically inadmissible infusion of energy during close cycles of contact movement [40]. To avoid these problems, we used the Jäger algorithm for the tangential force, which can model arbitrary sequences of normal and tangential contact movements [39]. With the Cattaneo-Mindlin contacts, the loading simulations were conducted with an inter-particle friction coefficient µ = 0.55, particle shear modulus G = 29 GPa, and Poisson ratio ν = 0.15.…”
Section: Appendix a Dem Modeling Details And Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such implementations do not permit frictional dissipation in the form of 29 micro-slip and can result in an unfortunate and physically inadmissible infusion of energy during close cycles of contact movement [40]. To avoid these problems, we used the Jäger algorithm for the tangential force, which can model arbitrary sequences of normal and tangential contact movements [39]. With the Cattaneo-Mindlin contacts, the loading simulations were conducted with an inter-particle friction coefficient µ = 0.55, particle shear modulus G = 29 GPa, and Poisson ratio ν = 0.15.…”
Section: Appendix a Dem Modeling Details And Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assemblies are large enough to capture the average material behavior but sufficiently small to prevent meso-scale localization, such as shear bands. The contact model was a full implementation of a Hertz-Mindlin contact between elasticfrictional spheres by using the Jäger algorithm, which can model arbitrary sequences of normal and tangential contact movements (Kuhn 2011). The simulations were conducted with an inter-particle friction coefficient µ = 0.60, particle shear modulus G = 29 GPa, and Poisson ratio ν = 0.15.…”
Section: Dem Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results discussed above are exclusively for axisymmetric triaxial conditions, in which the initial probe state was established with constant-p triaxial compression (ε 11 < 0) and in which the subsequent triaxial probes were conducted with equal lateral strains, dε 22 = dε 33 .…”
Section: Multi-directional Elastic-plastic Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%