2022
DOI: 10.5194/essd-14-143-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of the CCDC algorithm to produce the LCMAP Collection 1.0 annual land surface change product

Abstract: Abstract. The increasing availability of high-quality remote sensing data and advanced technologies has spurred land cover mapping to characterize land change from local to global scales. However, most land change datasets either span multiple decades at a local scale or cover limited time over a larger geographic extent. Here, we present a new land cover and land surface change dataset created by the Land Change Monitoring, Assessment, and Projection (LCMAP) program over the conterminous United States (CONUS)… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regional analyses of four megaregions were based on Omernik ecoregions (Omernik and Griffith 2014) using boundaries generally defined in previous USGS regional studies (Sleeter et Published freely available LCMAP Reference data v1.2 (Pengra et al 2020c) is selected for this study because it allows for statistically rigorous area estimates of land cover composition and change on public and private land across CONUS when combined with the PAD-US data. Pengra et al (2020b) report that all LCMAP reference data are generated by trained interpreters who assign (1) land use, (2) land cover, and (3) change processes for every year between 1985 and 2018 to each reference sample plot using the TimeSync (Cohen et al 2010) Landsat time series visualization and data collection tool (Pengra et al 2020c, Xian et al 2022. After TimeSync interpretation, the information was translated to the appropriate LCMAP land cover class, providing a single land cover reference label for each sample plot (Pengra et al 2020b, Pengra et al 2020c.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional analyses of four megaregions were based on Omernik ecoregions (Omernik and Griffith 2014) using boundaries generally defined in previous USGS regional studies (Sleeter et Published freely available LCMAP Reference data v1.2 (Pengra et al 2020c) is selected for this study because it allows for statistically rigorous area estimates of land cover composition and change on public and private land across CONUS when combined with the PAD-US data. Pengra et al (2020b) report that all LCMAP reference data are generated by trained interpreters who assign (1) land use, (2) land cover, and (3) change processes for every year between 1985 and 2018 to each reference sample plot using the TimeSync (Cohen et al 2010) Landsat time series visualization and data collection tool (Pengra et al 2020c, Xian et al 2022. After TimeSync interpretation, the information was translated to the appropriate LCMAP land cover class, providing a single land cover reference label for each sample plot (Pengra et al 2020b, Pengra et al 2020c.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial input for the synthetic ETa was land cover data from the Land Change Monitoring Assessment and Projection (LCMAP) project, which were derived from the CCDC algorithm. LCMAP utilizes ARD [36] after cloud-contaminated pixels have been removed using the Fmask algorithm [37,38]. To generate LCMAP data, CCDC fits a harmonic model to each individual band in the Landsat ARD to generate per-pixel estimates [19].…”
Section: Landsat and Synthetic Ccdc Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experiment used expert time series photointerpretations covering 25 000 CONUS-based plots from the LCMAP & LCMS projects (Pengra et al 2020, Housman et al 2022, Xian et al 2022 as reference data. This dataset has both land cover and land use interpretations spanning 1986-2020, and this experiment used the dataset's six land use classes: Forest, Developed, Agriculture, Wetland, Rangeland, and Other.…”
Section: Estimating Land Use and Change Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature vector contains per-band quartile means, two half means, min, max, mean, and median, and the magnitude differences between the min and max, half means, and the first and fourth quartiles. Additionally, we included feature vectors generated from the global CCDC dataset, influenced by the methodology of the USGS LCMAP project (Xian et al 2022). Since CCDC parameters remain the same across years until the algorithm finds a breakpoint, there is no chance of predicting an intersegment land use class change if the only predictor variables are the segments' harmonic coefficients.…”
Section: Estimating Land Use and Change Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%