Implementation of the basic hazard index screening for health risks associated with simultaneous exposure to multiple chemicals using a standardized target organ and systems framework

Abstract

Environmental health risk assessments often involve assessing the potential health effects of exposure to multiple chemicals at once (i.e., complex mixtures). Because the possible number of chemical combinations is very large, few controlled in vivo toxicological studies with chemical mixtures are relevant or practical. In lieu of specific mixture toxicity data, the segregated hazard index (HI) approach has been used to determine whether simultaneous exposures may warrant further investigation due to their combined adverse effects. Each chemical is assigned to one or more target organs based on critical effects; HIs for each target organ are generated by summing the individual hazard quotients for each of the chemicals assigned to that organ or organ system. To conduct this phased risk assessment approach in a consistent manner, a comprehensive, systematized list of toxicity targets for implementing this approach is needed. We present a comprehensive and standardized list of toxicity target organs and systems (TTOS), with example data sets, for consistent implementation of the segregated HI method. This method is designed to facilitate the standardization of the widespread use of the basic segregated HI approach. The basic hazard index mixtures screening (BHIMS) tool allows for rapid identification of exposure concerns that may warrant further and more sophisticated assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:852-860. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Electrocatalytic water treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances reduces adsorbable organofluorine and bioaccumulation potential

“…The Hazard Index is an established USEPA approach used to understand health risk from chemical mixtures. 50 A hazard index value at or below 1 suggests that cumulative exposure is generally considered safe and unlikely to cause significant adverse health effects, while a hazard index value above 1 indicates potential health risks, necessitating further assessment and possibly mitigation measures to lower such exposures. However, a hazard index of 0 does not imply that there are no concerns associated with PFAS.…”

Multi-Year Monitoring of the Toxicological Risk of Heavy Metals Related to Fish Consumption by the Population of the Kendari Region (Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia)

“…An HI value greater than or equal to one indicates a potential for deleterious effects on human health [ 74 , 75 ] (USEPA hazard index).…”

“…To account for these synergistic effects, we evaluated the cumulative health risk by adding the THQs of the metals. The HI in this study is defined as follows: HI = THQAs + THQCd + THQHg + THQNi + THQPb (2) An HI value greater than or equal to one indicates a potential for deleterious effects on human health [74,75] (USEPA hazard index).…”

A pragmatic approach for human risk assessment of chemical mixtures

“…An essential step in MRA is the grouping of chemicals according to their effects or mode/mechanism of action (step 5) using relevant animal and non-animal data. A standardized methodology for grouping of chemicals based on target organ toxicities has been proposed by Adams et al [25]. This corresponds to the second tier proposed for component based mixture risk assessment in EFSAs draft guidance document [17].…”