2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of tactile sensors on a 3-Fingers Robotiq® adaptive gripper and visualization in VR using Arduino controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the tangential forces F r at the ring surfaces can be computed by multiplying the torques by the ring radius as in (11).…”
Section: ) Description Of Angular Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the tangential forces F r at the ring surfaces can be computed by multiplying the torques by the ring radius as in (11).…”
Section: ) Description Of Angular Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the complexities of production environment, the field of robotics and especially collaborative robotics have received considerable attention from the VR research community. An approach to link a robot with VR to evaluate the performance of a robotic gripper has been presented by (Pelliccia et al 2018). An early stage demonstrator to highlight the value of robot programming via VR was discussed by (de Giorgio et al 2017) using Unity game engine.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rigid, bulky form factor and wired interfaces of such systems can induce damage both to the skin (8) and to the devices; these systems also limit freedom in mobility. The pressure sensors in these and other cases rely on mechanisms that range from piezoresistive (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) and capacitive effects (15)(16)(17) that create passive changes to piezoelectric (18,19) and triboelectric (20,21) mechanisms that generate active electrical signals. Disadvantages include some combination of (i) operating pressure ranges (usually <100 kPa) that do not fully span those relevant to the socket-skin interface (up to 350 kPa) (12,(22)(23)(24); (ii) undesired hysteresis, drift, and nonlinearity over the full pressure range, particularly for those that rely on piezoresistive effects in soft composite materials (13,(25)(26)(27); and (iii) parasitic noise due to physical motions, prevalent in capacitive and triboelectric sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although commercial flexible pressure sensors for general applications support capabilities in pressure measurements, the operating ranges are not well matched to requirements for prostheses. In addition, their relatively large sizes and rigid packages lead to discomfort on the skin inside tight-fitting sockets (12,13). Furthermore, the physiological effects on the skin typically result not only from the effects of pressure but also from elevated temperature, accelerating negative effects on residual limb tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%