2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of Super-Twisting Control on Higher Order Perturbed Integrator System using Higher Order Sliding Mode Observer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using Euler parameters rather than Euler angles provides us the advantage of a well-defined Jacobian matrix, which is necessary to be able to use the inverse of the Jacobian matrix. However, at the same time, we cannot use the HOSMO from [22], which means that we need velocity measurements to control the system. The complete state vector specifying the position, orientation, and shape of the AIAUV is then represented as…”
Section: Modelling and The Tracking Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using Euler parameters rather than Euler angles provides us the advantage of a well-defined Jacobian matrix, which is necessary to be able to use the inverse of the Jacobian matrix. However, at the same time, we cannot use the HOSMO from [22], which means that we need velocity measurements to control the system. The complete state vector specifying the position, orientation, and shape of the AIAUV is then represented as…”
Section: Modelling and The Tracking Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20] tracking control of the centre of mass of the AIAUV in 2D was considered by using STA with adaptive gains [19] and a higher-order sliding mode observer (HOSMO) [22]. It was proven that the tracking errors were ultimately bounded, and the simulation results demonstrated that the proposed control method provided excellent tracking capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By designing the observer structure as in , the state observer is chosen as follows: rightleftp^1=truetruep^1,xtruetruep^1,y=truep^2,x+z1,xtruep^2,y+z1,yrightrightleftp^2=truetruep^2,xtruetruep^2,y=truep^3,x+z2,x+1mtFnormalCnormalM,dxtruep^3,y+z2,y+1mtFnormalCnormalM,dyrightleftp^3=truetruep^3,xtruetruep^3,y=z3,xz3,y…”
Section: Control and Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the STA is only applicable to systems where the control input appears in the equation for the first derivative of the sliding variable, both the position and velocity of the USM must be available for measurement. For the case when only the position measurements are available, we use a higher鈥恛rder sliding mode observer, as proposed in , to estimate the states. Hence, we combine the results from and , as done in , but we replace the regular STA with a STA with adaptive gains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation