Implementation of new technology: how to best train the trainers

Lightner, Amy L.

doi:10.1111/codi.14755

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

(15 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The current evidence lacks reporting of its impact on clinical outcomes and its effectiveness compared with generic TTT course training. In 2019, Gómez Ruiz et al published an expert consensus on aTTT curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery, which was accompanied by a published editorial[57,58]. Fourteen experts in robotic surgery (defined as having performed a minimum of 50 robotic colorectal resections and being involved in training in colorectal surgery) participated using a modified Delphi process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024)

Tou,

Au,

Clancy

et al. 2024

Colorectal Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recommendations 777 Knowledge required for performing robotic colorectal surgery: recommendations 777 Technical skills required for performing robotic colorectal surgery: recommendations 778 Nontechnical skills required for performing robotic colorectal surgery: recommendation 778 Assessment of competency/proficiency during training in robotic colorectal surgery: recommendation 778 Credentialing in robotic colorectal surgery: recommendation 778 Clinical outcome data registry in robotic colorectal surgery: recommendation 778 BACKGROUND 778 Target audience 778 METHOD 779 Formation of the guideline working group 779 Process of guideline construction 779 Scope of this guideline 779 Knowledge required for performing robotic colorectal surgery 779 Technical skills required for performing robotic colorectal surgery 780 Nontechnical skills required for performing robotic colorectal surgery 780 Assessment of competency/proficiency during training in robotic colorectal surgery Credentialing in robotic colorectal surgery Clinical outcome data registry in robotic colorectal surgery Outcomes measured Critical for decision-making Important, but not critical for decision-making Of low importance Literature searches Resources Handling of citations Study eligibility assessment and selection Reviewing research evidence Method used to make recommendations Drafting of statements and supporting text RESULTS Knowledge required for performing robotic colorectal surgery Recommendation Rationale for recommendation Future research priorities Recommendation Rationale for recommendation Future research priorities This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024)

Tou,

Au,

Clancy

et al. 2024

Colorectal Disease

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Training of Trainers in Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosurgery

Ammar

2022

Learning and Career Development in Neurosurgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Rectal Cancer Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis Results in High Rate of Restorative Minimally Invasive Surgery

Carvello

Bellato

Maroli

et al. 2021

Journal of Crohn's and Colitis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aims Few recent studies focus on the treatment of rectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis. We report treatment options and results for this subset of patients with a multimodal approach at two European referral centers. Methods Ulcerative colitis patients diagnosed with rectal cancer arising at less than 15 cm from the anal verge between January 2010 and December 2020 were analyzed. Demographics, clinical data, details of medical and surgical treatment were retrieved from prospectively collected institutional databases. Results Of 132 patients with ulcerative colitis and concomitant colorectal cancer, rectal cancer was diagnosed in 46. The median time between disease onset and rectal cancer diagnosis was 17.5 years. Twenty-one/46 were preoperatively staged as early tumors (cT1-T2/N0). Eleven patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced extraperitoneal adenocarcinoma, while the rest underwent surgery first. Over two-thirds of the procedures were restorative (68%); a minimally invasive approach was used in 96% of patients with no conversion to open. The median follow-up was 44 months. Local recurrence occurred in 3 patients (6%). The cumulative 3-years cancer-specific survival rate was 94% (and the 3-years disease-free rate was 86%). Conclusion Rectal cancer in ulcerative colitis is a very complex condition. Our results show that surgery for rectal cancer can be delivered with excellent oncologic and functional outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis. A multidisciplinary discussion among surgeons, gastroenterologists, medical oncologists is key to ensure the appropriate treatment pathway for individual patients.

show abstract

Implementation of new technology: how to best train the trainers

Cited by 3 publications

References 17 publications

European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024)

European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024)

Training of Trainers in Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosurgery

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Rectal Cancer Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis Results in High Rate of Restorative Minimally Invasive Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About