2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of Johnson-Holmquist-Beissel model in four-dimensional lattice spring model and its application in projectile penetration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these two simulations in Figure 3 b, the particle diameter is 41 m, the impact velocity is 650 m/s, and the numerical techniques are Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian (CEL) for Cu/Cu and Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) for Al/B C. The trend of the average PEEQ over B C particle using the JHB model is analogous to that of the average PEEQ over the Cu particle using the modified JC model with SGP, demonstrating the consistency between the modified JC with the SGP effect and the JHB material model. This is attributed to the inclusion of the plastic strain rate effect in these two models, which is more representative of dynamic impact loading cases [ 83 , 84 , 85 ]. Figure 3 b also shows that the B C deformation rate in the Al/B C coating is higher than the Cu deformation rate in the Cu/Cu coating, which can be attributed to different particle types and material models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these two simulations in Figure 3 b, the particle diameter is 41 m, the impact velocity is 650 m/s, and the numerical techniques are Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian (CEL) for Cu/Cu and Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) for Al/B C. The trend of the average PEEQ over B C particle using the JHB model is analogous to that of the average PEEQ over the Cu particle using the modified JC model with SGP, demonstrating the consistency between the modified JC with the SGP effect and the JHB material model. This is attributed to the inclusion of the plastic strain rate effect in these two models, which is more representative of dynamic impact loading cases [ 83 , 84 , 85 ]. Figure 3 b also shows that the B C deformation rate in the Al/B C coating is higher than the Cu deformation rate in the Cu/Cu coating, which can be attributed to different particle types and material models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te U-shaped steel support is a kind of roadway support with mature technology. After nearly 90 years of development, scholars at home and abroad have carried out a lot of studies on the existing problems of U-shaped steel support and put forward many improvement measures, such as the fact that the supporting performance of U-shaped steel support can be efectively improved by adding prestressed anchor cable, structural compensation for weak links of support, back-wall flling or back-wall grouting, and leg-lock support for dangerous section positions [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Trough numerical simulation and feld industrial experiments, Xie et al proposed to increase the bearing capacity and antideformation capacity of U-shaped steel supports through the anchoring of anchor cables, so as to realize the overall bearing capacity of U-shaped steel supports [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the thermoelastoplastic coupled damage model of concrete under dynamic load is established, a more general shock load equation of state (GEOS) is used to represent the strain-average pressure, and the micromechanical constitutive model parameters of the fourdimensional spring model (4D-LSM) are determined. It is applied to simulate and analyze the instantaneous deformation failure of U-shaped steel under diferent initial impact velocities [16][17][18]. Wang et al established a mechanical model of the U-shaped steel support and surrounding rock-bearing capacity and proposed the reinforcement support method of anchor cable with a longitudinal steel belt beam in the middle of the shed leg, shoulder socket, and middle of the arch beam [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of scholars have carried out research work on theoretical aspects of rock masses and numerical simulations [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Te inversion method using a combination of actual measurements and numerical calculations is one of the efective methods to obtain the mechanical parameters of the surrounding rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%