2021
DOI: 10.33172/jp.v7i3.1459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of International Norms and Practices in Indonesian Diplomacy 1962-1969 in Maintaining West Irian as an Inseparable Part of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia

Abstract: <p>It can be said that issues about Papua that often come to the surface are always associated with the legal aspect of the entry of Papua into an inseparable part of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). Groups that want Papua to be separated from the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia not only seek support from countries such as Solomon Island or Vanuatu but also voice it to the United Nations forum. In this regard, a historical reflection is needed to provide an overview with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the New York Agreement of 1962 did not involve indigenous Papuans in the process, leading them to feel neglected. The same occurred in determining Papua's political status through the Act of Free Choice in 1969, where indigenous Papuans felt marginalized as all their representatives in the Act's Decision-Making Body (DMP) were determined by the Indonesian military (Asmoro et al, 2021). Overall, the procedures for determining DMP representation and the implementation of the Act of Free Choice were considered unfair, depriving indigenous Papuans of the opportunity to determine their own destiny.…”
Section: Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the New York Agreement of 1962 did not involve indigenous Papuans in the process, leading them to feel neglected. The same occurred in determining Papua's political status through the Act of Free Choice in 1969, where indigenous Papuans felt marginalized as all their representatives in the Act's Decision-Making Body (DMP) were determined by the Indonesian military (Asmoro et al, 2021). Overall, the procedures for determining DMP representation and the implementation of the Act of Free Choice were considered unfair, depriving indigenous Papuans of the opportunity to determine their own destiny.…”
Section: Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%