Implementation of Integrated Pest Management in Pigeonpea and Chickpea Pests in Major Pulse-Growing Areas of Maharashtra

Sharma, O. P.; Bantewad, S. D.; Patange, N. R.; Bhede, B.V.; Badgujar, A.G.; Ghante, P.H.; Kadam, M. V.; Bhagat, Someshwar; Kumari, Anita

doi:10.1093/jipm/pmv011

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In current manuscript neonicotinoid insecticide was used on calendar and ETL based for jassid control on okra crop. Our results compile with the findings of (Sharma et al, 2015) indicates that the new generation insecticides against sucking pest improved the marketable yield of okra fruits without affecting the environment. According to results calendar treatment obtain high yield as compare to other two treatments.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 84%

Determination of Economic Threshold Level (ETL) of Jassid, Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla (Cicadellidae:Homoptera)

Nawaz¹,

Razaq²,

Sarwar³

et al. 2018

PJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 84%

Determination of Economic Threshold Level (ETL) of Jassid, Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla (Cicadellidae:Homoptera)

Nawaz¹,

Razaq²,

Sarwar³

et al. 2018

PJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The EI of IPM could decrease even more through the development of alternative control tactics for the bud midge P. longifila . EIQ used in IPM training has provided farmers with a new tool to understand insecticide implications in vegetable production (Sharma et al., ). In Indonesia, through IPM and farmer field school approaches, EIQ has been introduced as a tool for farmers, authorities, and extension agents to select pesticide management strategies with the least impact on the agroecosystem (FAO ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecological, economic, and environmental assessments of integrated pest management in potato: A case study from the Cañete Valley, Peru

Mujica

Kroschel

2018

Food and Energy Security

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integrated pest management (IPM) versus farmers’ pest management practices were evaluated in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the central coast of Peru. IPM technologies consisted of seed treatment, insect pest, and disease scouting using action thresholds for decision making to apply pesticides, and the use of trapping devices and selective insecticides versus chemical control by potato farmers. An ecological, environmental, and economic analysis of both approaches was carried out by using biodiversity indices, environmental impact indicators, and partial budget analysis. The leafminer fly Liriomyza huidobrensis (Blanchard) and the bud midge Prodiplosis longifila (Gagne) were the most important pests during the cropping season. Larval infestation of both pests and leafminer foliar damage were less in IPM plots. Almost twice as many pesticide (insecticide and fungicide) applications per season were carried out on farmers’ practices plots with 16.7 sprayings compared to 9.7 sprayings in IPM plots. The total quantity of pesticides used per season was higher under farmers’ practices (4,614.3 g a.i./ha) than in IPM (2,042.6 g a.i./ha) plots. Likewise, farmers applied five times more insecticides (3,620.3 g a.i./ha) than IPM (722.55 g a.i./ha). Methamidophos and chlorpyrifos accounted for 65% of the environmental impact (EI) value of 137/ha in farmers’ fields. IPM strategies reduced the EI to 42.4/ha, which represents a reduction of 69.2%. Further, IPM achieved 35% higher marketable potato yield than farmers’ practices. Partial budget analysis showed a higher net profit in all IPM plots, with an average increase of US$1,410/ha. The field trials demonstrated the environmental and economic viability of IPM for potato in the central coast of Peru. However, while there are effective integrated components for leafminer fly management, there is a clear need to develop and integrate more sustainable and ecological pest management strategies for other economically important pests such as the bud midge.

show abstract

“…Cereals like rice (37%), maize (31%), corn, pearl millet and chickpea (26%), oil crops like cotton (37–65%) (Aheer, Ali, & Akram, 2009; Honnakerappa & Udikeri, 2018), vegetables like tomato (37–80%) (Choudhary, Kumar, Jat, Ram, & Deshwal, 2017), potato (40%), okra, soybeans field beans, peas (26–29%), (Abhilash & Shekharappa, 2017) and fruits like, citrus are profoundly affected by this pest. Various pest control measures such as chemical insecticides (Babariya, Kabaria, Patel, & Joshi, 2010; Pathange & Chiranjeevi, 2017), new generation microbial agents ( Trichoderma viride and Bacillus megatherium ) and bio‐pesticides (Gajendran, Chandrasekaran, & Jebaraj, 2006; Sharma et al, 2015) have not been successful in controlling this pest. This challenging scenario indicates the need to identify novel sources of resistance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Secondary genepool of Australian Cajanus species contains sources of resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)

Vanambathina

Henry

Rachaputi

et al. 2021

Annals of Applied Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A narrow genetic base in cultivated pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) limits the host plant resistance (HPR) to the devastating pest Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Earlier research on pod borer resistance in wild Cajanus relatives has mainly explored the tertiary genepool, making breeding for resistance difficult because of linkage drag. Previous investigations on a wide range of Australian native germplasm from the secondary and tertiary gene pools revealed resistance in the secondary gene pool, associated with total phenolic content (TPC). This study reports the application of the extreme phenotype genome‐wide association (XP‐GWAS) to associate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with resistance traits. Mapping of 19 accessions, including 12 wild accessions to a reference pigeonpea genome have identified a total of 16,489 and 16,227 nonsynonymous SNPs for the resistance and TPC traits, respectively. These SNPs were subjected to functional analysis, and KEGG pathway analysis revealed the presence of candidate genes coding for the crucial enzymes in five defence‐related pathways that could be contributing to resistance. These pathways involve ‘Jasmonic acid synthesis’ (palmitoyl‐CoA hydrolase, phospholipase A1 and phospholipase A2), ‘insect hormone biosynthesis’ (aldehyde dehydrogenase) ‘Steroid biosynthesis’ (squalene monooxygenase, farnesyl transferase and lanosterol synthase), ‘Cutin, suberine and wax synthesis’ (O‐acyltransferase) and ‘Brassinosteroid biosynthesis’ (Det2). Analysis of SNPs associated with the TPC trait led to the identification of a divergent pathway of ‘secondary metabolite synthesis’ (flavonoid 3′ hydroxylase, l‐rhamnosyltransferase) in wild Cajanus species consistent with a high concentration of isoorientin and the possible presence of its derivative maysin; a strong insecticidal compound in leaves.

show abstract

Implementation of Integrated Pest Management in Pigeonpea and Chickpea Pests in Major Pulse-Growing Areas of Maharashtra

Cited by 9 publications

References 4 publications

Determination of Economic Threshold Level (ETL) of Jassid, Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla (Cicadellidae:Homoptera)

Determination of Economic Threshold Level (ETL) of Jassid, Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla (Cicadellidae:Homoptera)

Ecological, economic, and environmental assessments of integrated pest management in potato: A case study from the Cañete Valley, Peru

Secondary genepool of Australian Cajanus species contains sources of resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About