2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(02)00301-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of e-procurement and e-fulfillment processes: A comparison of cases in the motorcycle industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…transparency, order discounts and price efficiency) as well as external business innovation such as new market penetration (Benton, 2007). E-procurement promotes better management of information and knowledge of suppliers, better control of supplier operations, (Muffatto and Payaro, 2004). In addition, e-procurement may result in increased speed, quantity and quality of information processing, especially with international suppliers (Essig and Arnold, 2001.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…transparency, order discounts and price efficiency) as well as external business innovation such as new market penetration (Benton, 2007). E-procurement promotes better management of information and knowledge of suppliers, better control of supplier operations, (Muffatto and Payaro, 2004). In addition, e-procurement may result in increased speed, quantity and quality of information processing, especially with international suppliers (Essig and Arnold, 2001.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Croom (2000) identified four main benefits: lower procurement process cost, greater visibility on expenditure control, increase in procurement control and benefits from managing suppliers. E-procurement promotes better management of information and knowledge of suppliers and better control of supplier operations (Muffatto and Payaro, 2004). E-procurement may result in greater transparency in procurement (Puschmann and Alt, 2005); increased speed, quantity and quality of information processing (Essig and Arnold, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based upon a careful review of the literature it was possible to identify the following key elements of the model [see figure 1], which would help to explain an organisation"s adoption practices: It must be reiterated that the vast majority of the literature that helped us to develop this model related to the experiences of private sector organisations. From this literature, we tend to get a picture of organisations that are very conscious of the potential benefits of eprocurement technology, and see it as an obvious solution to the problems they are experiencing with their existing purchasing processes Consequently, they have typically been keen to adopt such technologies, as long as their internal situation, in terms of the balance between drivers and inhibitors, appears favourable [Muffato and Payaro, 2004]. However, private and public sector procurement is different in a number of key respects: public sector procurement is often hidebound by formalised, bureaucratic and rigid procedures [Spiller, 2008], and constrained by political imperatives [Murray, 2009].…”
Section: Conceptual Model Of E-procurement Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 99%