Implementation of Directive 2014/17/EU and its Impact on EU and Member States Markets, from not only a Czech Perspective

Cvik, Eva Daniela; Pelikánová, Radka MacGregor

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.472

Cited by 12 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Strategy Europe 2020 and its drive for the smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, emphasizes the critical importance of the development of the digital single market (Pasimeni and Pasimeni, 2016), digital agenda (Cvik and MacGregor Pelikánová, 2016) and technological potential (Balcerzak, 2016;Zelazny and Pietrucha, 2017), and of the synchronization and mutual recognition of national and sectorial eID systems (Stec and Grzebyk, 2017;Radulescu, 2018). This is materialized by Regulation 2014, i.e.…”

Section: Legislative and Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualified Electronic Signature - eIDAS Striking Czech Public Sector Bodies

Pelikánová¹,

Cvik²,

MacGregor³

2019

Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electronic IDentification, Authentication and trust Services (“eIDAS”) is a standardized system for trustworthiness, effectiveness and efficiency. Since 2018, Czech public sector bodies have to use qualified electronic signatures when officially acting via electronic documents. This calls for a pioneering study entailing three purposes: (i) to identify provisions set by the EU law and Czech law of this duty and to interpret them, (ii) to study and assess how this duty is materialized and observed while using a pioneering Czech micro case study and (iii) to discuss and compare the yielded results with the status quo in other EU member states. A multi-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional research of primary and secondary sources is performed along with a Czech micro case study exploring the readiness, implementation and consequences of this new duty on five Czech public sector bodies – Prague municipalities. The qualified electronic signature is a reality in the EU, but its standardized use is welcome and materialized with varying intensities.

show abstract

Section: Legislative and Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualified Electronic Signature - eIDAS Striking Czech Public Sector Bodies

Pelikánová¹,

Cvik²,

MacGregor³

2019

Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The literature review regarding the general (lack of) clarity of the GDPR and the special issue of the DPO begins, similarly to the legislative review, with a re-confirmation of the EU commitment to the doctrine of the famous four freedoms of movement in the single internal market (Cvik & MacGregor Pelikánová, 2016) in the 21 st century econtext MacGregor Pelikánová, 2012) and the very broad reach of the GDPR (Tankard, 2016). This commitment mirrors the interaction of public administration, business, law and information systems/information technologies in our global society, which is full of contradictions (Vivant, 2016), of confusion between historical truth and reality (Chirita, 2014), and of increasingly more complex and dynamic organization settings and proceedings (Piekarczyk, 2016) where the ultimate value is the information (MacGregor Pelikánová, 2014b) as the top commodity of the post-modern society dominated by information systems and information technologies channeled via the Internet or otherwise (MacGregor Pelikánová, 2012& MacGregor Pelikánová, 2013.…”

Section: Source: Authorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selected Issues from the Dark Side of the General Data Protection Regulation

Cvik

Pelikánová

Malý

2018

Review of Economic Perspectives

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of personal data (GDPR) was enacted in 2016 and applies from 25 th May 2018 in the entire EU. The GDPR is a product of an ambitious reform and represents a direct penetration of the EU law into the legal systems of the EU member states. The EU works on the enhancement of awareness about the GDPR and points out its bright side. However, the GDPR has its dark side as well, which will inevitably have a negative impact. Hence, the goal of this paper is twofold -(i) to scientifically identify, forecast, and analyze selected problematic aspects of the GDPR and its implementation, in particular for Czech municipalities, and (ii) to propose recommendations about how to reduce, or even avoid, their negative impacts. These theoretic analyses are projected to a Czech case study focusing on municipalities, which offers fresh primary data and allows a further refining of the proposed recommendations. An integral part of the performed analyses is also a theoretic forecast of expenses linked to the GDPR, which municipalities will have to include in their mandatory expenses and mid-term prognostic expectations regarding the impact on the budgets of these municipalities from Central Bohemia. The GDPR, like Charon, is at the crossing, the capacity and knowledge regarding its application is critical for operating in the EU in 2018. It is time both to admit that the GDPR has its dark side and to present real and practical recommendations about how to mitigate it.

show abstract

“…The literature overview shares the same pathway as the legislative overview. Indeed, it recognizes the EU commitment to the doctrine of the four freedoms of movement in the single internal market (Cvik and MacGregor Pelikánová, 2016) in a 21 st century digital context (MacGregor Pelikánová, 2012) and the broad reach of the GDPR (Tankard, 2016). So the EU opted for a unified legal regime but academia commented on this exceedingly heavily praised presented drive of the EU via pragmatic and more objective observations.…”

Section: Legislative and Literature Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of GDPR Security Measures on the Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition

Pelikánová

Cvik

2018

Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (“GDPR”) created a duty to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure a level of security to protect natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. Infringement of this duty is severely punished. These GDPR security measures and their operation should effectively and efficiently reflect intellectual property (“IP”) and unfair competition concerns. The theoretic teleological interpretation of the GDPR along with the critical study of the academic literature is complemented by a practical exploratory investigation via a micro‑case study based on interviews of a well‑balanced group of subjects of this GDRP duty – Czech SMEs. Although the yielded results are rather indicative than generally conclusive, they allow to suggest a partial confirmation of the proposed hypotheses that this GDPR duty will have a significant impact on IP and unfair competition. The semi‑conclusions based on the primary and secondary data enlightens the status quo, offers recommendations and brings suggestions for further research.

show abstract

Implementation of Directive 2014/17/EU and its Impact on EU and Member States Markets, from not only a Czech Perspective

Cited by 12 publications

References 10 publications

Qualified Electronic Signature - eIDAS Striking Czech Public Sector Bodies

Qualified Electronic Signature - eIDAS Striking Czech Public Sector Bodies

Selected Issues from the Dark Side of the General Data Protection Regulation

Impact of GDPR Security Measures on the Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About