2018
DOI: 10.1002/dac.3714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of depth‐based routing and its enhancement in AquaSim–Next Generation for underwater wireless sensor networks

Abstract: Summary In the last decade, underwater wireless sensor networks have been widely studied because of their peculiar aspects that distinguish them from common terrestrial wireless networks. Their applications range from environmental monitoring to military defense. The definition of efficient routing protocols in underwater sensor networks is a challenging topic of research because of the intrinsic characteristics of these networks, such as the need of handling the node mobility and the difficulty in balancing t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bit Error Rate (BER): We assume that the underwater acoustic micro-modem uses binary phase shift keying (BPSK) modulation [ 17 , 19 , 33 ]. Accordingly, the bit error rate ( P e ) of BPSK in an underwater Rayleigh fading channel can be calculated as in [ 33 ]: where SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio defined by Equation (1).…”
Section: Eedor Void Avoidance With Hop Count Discovery Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bit Error Rate (BER): We assume that the underwater acoustic micro-modem uses binary phase shift keying (BPSK) modulation [ 17 , 19 , 33 ]. Accordingly, the bit error rate ( P e ) of BPSK in an underwater Rayleigh fading channel can be calculated as in [ 33 ]: where SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio defined by Equation (1).…”
Section: Eedor Void Avoidance With Hop Count Discovery Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The routing procedure continues only if the transmitter sensors depth is higher than that of the receiver. The main disadvantages of this protocol are lack of management on the network blind spots (which leads to higher energy consumption and higher end-toend delay), and energy imbalance in the sensor network [6]. CODBR Protocol In wireless sensor networks, due to phenomena such as underwater currents, underwater living creatures, saltwater and due to dispersion and absorption of sound waves, distortion or partial data loss is quite possible.…”
Section: Current Under Water Routing Protocols 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several protocols have been developed for energy saving and end-to-end delay reduction in under water wireless networks [4]. Many protocols have been thus developed namely vector base forwarding (VBF) [5], and depth based routing (DBR) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network topology of the WSNs will range from a simplistic star network to a complex multihop wireless mesh network. The propagation form of the network may be way or flood [5,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%