2020
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.0c03794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of Cooperative Designs in Polarized Transition Metal Systems—Significance for Bond Activation and Catalysis

Abstract: Bond activation and catalysis are central to the development of a sustainable energy system. Frustrated Lewis Pairs have conceptually revolutionized the activation of inert chemical bonds. Far less developed are hybrid systems containing at least one transition metal as part of the electron-donating/accepting composition. These cooperative transition metal architectures present advantages over traditional systems. For instance, they incorporate, to the concept of FLPs, the movement of electron pairs as typical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 260 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A putative catalytic cycle for the hydrogenation of the formate ester to methanol is illustrated in Scheme 3 via the widely inferred metal–ligand cooperation (MLC) mechanism. 40 , 41 , 49 51 Plausible alternatives are, however, also conceivable, involving, for example, activation of the C=O unit by Na + instead of H + at the ligand amide group or heterolytic H 2 cleavage at a cationic Mn 1+ complex after carboxylate, alcoholate, or CO dissociation (see the Supporting Information for a schematic representation). 9 , 52 − 65 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A putative catalytic cycle for the hydrogenation of the formate ester to methanol is illustrated in Scheme 3 via the widely inferred metal–ligand cooperation (MLC) mechanism. 40 , 41 , 49 51 Plausible alternatives are, however, also conceivable, involving, for example, activation of the C=O unit by Na + instead of H + at the ligand amide group or heterolytic H 2 cleavage at a cationic Mn 1+ complex after carboxylate, alcoholate, or CO dissociation (see the Supporting Information for a schematic representation). 9 , 52 − 65 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catalysts bearing these ligands effectively promote the reactions that involve hydride and proton management, such as (de)hydrogenation [1–11] and borrowing‐hydrogenation [12–16] . The nature (acid‐base properties) and the position/orientation of proton‐responsive unit, along with the metal‐hydricity, [17] are the key considerations to enable metal‐ligand cooperation (MLC) [18–20] for efficient hydrogen delivery/acceptance [21–24] . Among the various designs explored, the protic catalysts based on the reversible (de)protonation of −OH/=O, −CH 2 /=CH and −NH/=N motifs on pyridine, [25–27] bipyridine, [28–32] bipyrimidine [33] and azole‐pyridine/pyrimidine [34–37] are particularly effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the free energy of mTSB2B3 is higher than that of TSC2C3 (27.9 vs 22.2 kcal/mol) in the rate‐determining step, the di ‐palladium catalysis is more favorable, and the calculations are well consistent with the experimental results that the catalytic activity of dinuclear palladium is higher than that of mononuclear palladium catalysis. The catalysis activity difference between dinuclear and mononuclear complex can be attributed to the roles of metal−metal cooperativity play in the activation of small molecules and the promotion and selectivity of subsequent catalytic transformations [53] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catalysis activity difference between dinuclear and mononuclear complex can be attributed to the roles of metal À metal cooperativity play in the activation of small molecules and the promotion and selectivity of subsequent catalytic transformations. [53]…”
Section: Pyrrole Formation From T Bucn and Phenylacetylene Catalyzed By Mononuclear Palladium Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%