Implementation of cloud computing in the German healthcare system

Putzier, M.; Khakzad, T.; Dreischarf, M.; Thun, S.; Trautwein, F.; Taheri, N.

doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01000-3

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, by applying established security frameworks such as ISO, NIST SP800-30r1, and OCTAVE strengthen the comprehensive integration of technologies, reinforce security for smart systems. Current security standards include information on suggested security controls, baselines, protocols with smart lines that are thought to be optimal for networks and, in some situations, required for compliance (Putzier et al, 2024). In contrast, many security assessment frameworks now in use include security best practices, techniques, and recommendations that organizations may use to ensure the implementation of successful cyber risk assessment strategies (Esho et al, 2024).…”

Section: Security Standards and Assessment Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cyber Security Risk Assessment Methods for Smart Healthcare

Memon,

Dhomeja

et al. 2024

ABBDM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The perverseness of the Internet of Things (IoT) has reached the healthcare sector, where interconnected medical devices are transforming how we deliver and manage health. These devices, linked wirelessly, create a vast network known as Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), that integrates seamlessly with the broader healthcare system. This interconnected infrastructure facilitates the exchange of massive amounts of patient data, paving the way for a more distributed and data-driven approach to healthcare. In healthcare’s ICT environment rely heavily on electronic health records (EHR), e-prescribing systems and other systems. Protecting this sensitive data necessitates robust cybersecurity measures. Even though data security is an indirect cost, it is crucial for healthcare systems. In general, patient trust in a healthcare system depends on the infrastructure’s ability to protect data from security and privacy threats. A critical component of this strategy is security risk assessment. A risk is an indirect cost borne by those designing these systems. The risk assessment process identifies, evaluates, and prioritizes potential threats to the organization’s assets including hardware and software. By assessing risks before acting, healthcare organizations can effectively allocate resources to mitigate the most critical vulnerabilities. While broadly applicable cyber risk assessment frameworks like NIST, ISO, and OCTAVE exist, they may lack a strong risk between assets, threats and impacts, and controls. Therefore, they do not provide a comprehensive picture for healthcare specifically. A more thorough examination is required to establish a strong association between protected systems, potential threats, and the resulting risks. This paper critically reviews these frameworks and their methodologies and limitations for healthcare cybersecurity. Even though data security is an indirect cost, it is crucial for healthcare systems.

show abstract

Section: Security Standards and Assessment Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cyber Security Risk Assessment Methods for Smart Healthcare

Memon,

Dhomeja

et al. 2024

ABBDM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Innovative digital health solutions: Use and acceptance among patients and professionals, and the influence of the regulatory framework - a survey-based distinction.

Pfoerringer,

Hinterwimmer,

Vogt

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Digital solutions are gaining increasing importance and present a challenge regarding the introduction and acceptance into professional medical environments. The latter aspect is largely caused by regulatory and legislative burdens hindering the adoption of new technologies. Although significant advances have been made regarding availability, safety, and ease of use of data generated by a multitude of devices and wearables, data security and data protection are delaying factors. The underlying analysis focuses on the use, acceptance of digital solutions and their respective differences between healthcare professionals and patients. Objective: This study examines the current use and acceptance of digital solutions among healthcare professionals and patients within the regulatory framework in Germany. In addition, it derives an outlook to future developments and expectations in the setting of highly regulated technologies able to penetrate the health market. Methods: An anonymous online survey of 23 multiple-choice and 3 open-text questions was conducted among medical professionals and patients between April and September 2023. In this study, quantitative analysis was performed using Python, with Pandas for data processing and Matplotlib for visualization. Chi-square tests were used to analyze binary categorical data, while Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate ordinal data. Additionally, a qualitative analysis was conducted to summarize the results of the open-ended questions. Results: During 178 days, the survey garnered 2,058 clicks, resulting in 1,389 participants (67.5% response rate). A total of 1,002 participants completed the entire questionnaire, while 387 (27.9%) did not finish. Incomplete responses were excluded from the comprehensive analysis. The sample comprised 271 physicians (27%) and 731 patients (73%). The study found significant agreement between both groups in adopting and foreseeing the use of digital health tools and telemedicine. Both groups recognized the future importance of digital health without substantial differences. Conclusions: Overall, attitudes towards digital health and telemedicine were consistent, reflecting a uniform acceptance and expectation of these technologies among healthcare professionals and patients. The consensus on telemedicine's future role over the next five years indicates a unified vision for digital health paradigms.

show abstract